Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Trust the World's Fastest VPN with Your Internet Security & Freedom - A Lifetime Subscription of PureVPN at 88% off. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:Death To All Jews (Score 1) 902

Anyone watching the end sequence of that video who goes on to describe it as anti-semitic either does not understand human emotion or is deliberately lying.

Its using an anti-Semitic message to make a point. I understand that fine. But its also a video where a smiling person merrily displays message promoting genocide while the host laughs his ass off. If that doesn't make you the least bit uncomfortable, I'm a little worried about you. And ironically, the "joke" appears to be "look, nobody's doing anything to stop me from saying these horrible things". So when someone comes along and in fact does a wee bit of that, I don't see where he's got a lot of valid ground to get mad about it. Its precisely what he was asking for in the first place.

As far as the WSJ misrepresenting something, that's hardly new for them.

Comment Re:wonder why asian elephant? (Score 2) 162

That's very interesting. Among other things, it implies that Mammoths and Asian elephants are closer related to each other than either is to African elephants (but not by much).

Another way of putting this is that its probably more accurate to consider Mammoths as just another species of Elephant.

There used to (in historic times) be another relatively small North African Elephant species (Hannibal used them in his war with Rome), that is also now extinct. There were quite recently lots of island-based pygmy elephants and pygmy mammoths too. If you could bring back a Mammoth, those might be equally recoverable.

Comment Re:Where? (Score 1) 62

Issues with this:

I don't live in Europe, Russia, China, or anywhere else on the planet.

I don't need it unlocked (which is usually more expensive here), because the phones I buy are cheap, and thus no real hardship to replace on the rare occasions I decide to jump ship (perhaps 3 times in the last 10 years).

It is already easy to move to a different carrier and take my number with me. Cell networks don't "own" numbers here anymore. Haven't for a long time.There are enough of us that my family actually has 2 plans (with different carriers) and we've switched carriers several times with at least 3 different numbers that I'm aware of..

I don't use my "phone" for talking, for the most part, but as a mobile internet device. It is now the exact midpoint of the month, and I'm (personally, not counting anyone else on the plan) at 2.4GB of data usage. I have multiple teenage girls on my plan too. Some bare-bones setup with 3GB a month would not be sufficient. If it was, I suspect they'd be available, but it isn't.

All of this has exactly 0 to do with my point about the availability of that manufacturer's devices for purchase in the US (again, they are not). If you feel personal ire toward a US cell carrier, that's certainly your prerogative. But kindly direct it in appropriate threads.

Comment Re:Where? (Score 0) 62

Why do you continue to be ripped off by your carrier?

That's quite a leap. But you seem to be in good company pole vaulting over there, so perhaps I should explain why this is relevant...

You see, in the US different carriers tend to have semi-incompatible phone networks. Therefore, I can't just go buy any cellphone and expect it to work optimally with my carrier. For instance, if I want an S7, I need to go buy the version of the S7 that is customized to work on my carrier's network.

Does that mean I need to buy it from my carrier directly? Of course not. I believe I bought my last cellphone off of Amazon. But it does mean my carrier's "phone store" web page is a good place to go when I want to present a nice central list of "the different types of phones that work on their network" for the purposes of discussion.

I assure you it is also the case that if we were talking about cars, and I illustrated a point with Toyota's web page for a Corolla, that doesn't mean I go buy brand new Corollas directly from Toyota all the time either.

Comment Re:Let's be clear on what we mean by election hack (Score 1) 250

Oh, get serious. The whole "superdelegate" apparatus exists only to thwart the will of the voters.

This is in fact 100% true. The theory behind it is that "the voters" in a primary could easily be people who just became Democrats this week (or in some states aren't even Democrats at all), don't give a crap about the party, or even want to actively sabotage it. Remember that primaries are the parties picking their standard-bearer, not the USA at large picking theirs. Superdelegates are elected officials (Governors, Senators, etc.) with at least some proven investment in the party itself. In recent history they almost never vote contrary to the wishes of their own constituents when those are clear, but they are there as an "in case of emergency, break glass" set of votes to salvage the party. If the Republicans hadn't got rid of most of theirs, we likely wouldn't have the "President Putin/Banner" circus we are enjoying today.

That being said, if the Democrats don't like having them, and would prefer to just let whoever shows up on election/caucus day decide with no possible check whatsoever, that's entirely their prerogative. There have been some changes already to reduce their influence, and more seem likely.

Comment Where? (Score 0) 62

I'm guessing these sales are happening almost entirely in China? There's no Huawei phone even listed as an option on my carrier's website. As a consumer, sales maketshare really doesn't mean a whole lot to me until they are selling phones in my market.

I can kinda see why they wouldn't bother though. While I think its really important that Samsung has good viable competition in Android devices, I don't think I'd be entirely comfortable buying myself a consumer communications device from a company with deep ties to the Chinese Army.

Comment Re:Not disconcerting (Score 1) 74

Whatever the reason, it's a natural behavior. Contemporary documentation of strandings dates back to at least the 16th century.

In fact, I find it quite heartening that we, as humans, now react by gathering a crowd and equipment to try to save them. The historical reaction seems to have been to gather all your neighbors and equipment and cut up all the free meat and oil-blubber.

If anyone is acting "unnaturally" here, its the humans.

Comment Re:Trump doesn't run borders (Score 1) 626

And they decided that a group of people has the same rights as a single person, essentially, and that you could not restrict the free speech of a group of people even if that happens to be a corporation. People don't hate that decision because it violates the constitution or various laws, but because it violates how we want the law to be. The only way to fix that is with a constitutional amendment.

Well...given that our SCOTUS judges are mostly older folks, and everyone who voted for it was appointed by a Republican POTUS (it was essentially a party-line vote), you could also fix it in the long run by not voting for a POTUS from that party and making sure to vote for a POTUS from the party that nominated all the dissenters.

Slashdot Top Deals

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]