Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
User Journal

Journal Surak's Journal: ($$$$exyGal == ekrout) No doubt. 21

Journal by Surak

From an AC on ASG's journal:

Alright, I'm a heavy duty $$$$exyGal troller....

I have to admit, I'm pretty confused. I still believe that $$$$exyGal is ekrout. Eric Krout is egotistical and conceited enough to go to such lengths fake being a girl.

The reason I continue to believe so is....why would Ekrout, a conceited person, who did so well fan whoring, suddenly and abruptly stop posting to slashdot. Slashdotters don't die...they just fade away. Especially Ekrout, who has such a low slashdot number, and who previously mentioned how much he has loved reading slashdot over the past 4 years. It also just seems odd that around the time Ekrout stopped, $$$$$exyGal started.

On top of that, they both compare the # of fans in an eerily same manner. The only three fan whorers on slashdot are Slashchick (who didn't really mean to fan whore...that's just how she is), Ekrout, and $$$$$exyGal. But Ekrouts and $$$$$exyGals comments, sigs, and fan whoring are nothing like Slashchicks. Also both Ekrout and $$$$exyGal use similar grammer structure, smilie faces, etc. (again, nothing like Slashchicks).

Now the creepiest part of all is how much $$$$exyGal talks about geeky guy subjects. I mean, what kind of a girl would write this!? [slashdot.org]. Carrying 24 inch monitors under their arms? Talk of Data on Star Trek? Lots of talk about muscles? This sure doesn't sound like a small-framed girl.

As for the proof that $$$$exyGal is a girl. Unfortunately, Anti$$$exy didn't ask any questions to prove she's not an actor. Somelike like, "Quick, tell me the pseudocode for writing a C++ program to display 'Hello world' 100 times. Also, what libraries are needed." Or "Give me the syntax for creating a web link." Or even, "Tell me some of the most common trolling reply's you've gotten..and what people have done them". No actor would be able to pull all those off.

So...I'm left with really no evidence still. And to be honest, there really isn't many ways to prove this. The only way I can think is to have $$$$exyGal record herself for about 10 minutes while rattling on about all her computer/geek knowledge, especially going off on tangents. Then, she could put that on a webpage for everyone to see.

All in all I have to agree. These are the reasons leading me to believe that $$$$exyGal is ekrout, and what made me change my sig line in the first place.

The only thing I would add to the AC's comments is this --

I think if SG really did prove to this "ASG" via videoconferencing that SG is female, then if she wants serious credibility, then "she" should probably prove to at least three or more of the people "she" lists on "her" fans chart ... i.e., CleverNickName, or CmdrTaco, or Bruce Perens, or anybody who is widely thought to be credible.

$$$$exyGal: if you do this, I will remove my sig line. Until then, I'm leaving my sig line as it stands in protest, because I still really do believe you are ekrout.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

($$$$exyGal == ekrout) No doubt. More

($$$$exyGal == ekrout) No doubt.

Comments Filter:
  • I think your sig should say '->sex == male'. Don't use gender as a euphemism for sex.

    (Esp. not since there are other $$$$exy user accounts on Slashdot, at least one of which refers to 'discrimination against transgendered people'.)
    • That's what I thought at first, but if you give it a little more thought... the evidence brought forth suggests being masculinely gendered, but is not in itself indicative of having male sex organs.
      • But who cares about the 'gender' defined in terms of interests and outlook on life: you can see that at once from the journal entries. What I and various indignant Slashdot trolls care about is the user in question's sex. There is no shocking revelation in saying '$$$$exyGal may claim to be a girl, but actually has a viewpoint which many in society would associate with male gender attitudes'. What the journal is saying, I think, is that '$$$$exyGal has testicles', and so 'sex' not 'gender' is the right word.
    • (Esp. not since there are other $$$$exy user accounts on Slashdot, at least one of which refers to 'discrimination against transgendered people'.)

      Now there's an idea! $$$$$exy$eth!

  • My girlfriend would say all those geeky things and do all those geeky things.. ;>

    Ok, count out the monitor transports... She's too tiny for that... ;)

    There actually are geek kind of girls, that talk about guy stuff... :)
  • then "she" should probably prove to at least three or more of the people "she" lists on "her" fans chart ... i.e., CleverNickName, or CmdrTaco, or Bruce Perens, or anybody who is widely thought to be credible.

    Er, I'm pretty sure that CleverNickName, or CmdrTaco, or Bruce Perens don't give a flying fuck.
    • Hey, $$$$exyGal agreed to this in "her" journal. Let's see if she takes my counteroffer.
  • I don't know Ekrot from a dog with bricks tied to it's head. But I'm convinced that SG is a chick. Read the words that she uses. She doesn't talk like guys do. And what guy is going to spend that much effort trying to convince you that he's a she.

    Take a strong dose of reality and call back in the morning.

Slashdot Top Deals

Q: How many IBM CPU's does it take to execute a job? A: Four; three to hold it down, and one to rip its head off.

Close