Supreme court as upheld that any private citizen has the right to record video and audio of public officials in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violates the citizen's First and Fourth Amendment rights. Not sure if paramedics are considered "Public Officials" and where the HIPPA violation comes into play, but it was on public property and the press likely wouldn't have be charged with similar crimes if they were caught videotaping the same scenario, so I would certainly appeal any guilty verdict if it arises.

Are we to assume it takes 20 years to get on this list? Maybe they were checking to see if anyone was paying attention?

HPSupport:badg3r5

"Nobody – from those who administered the practices to those at the top of the chain of command – is under a shield of absolute immunity for the practices of secret detention, extraordinary rendition and torture," said Martin Scheinin, UN special rapporteur on human rights and professor of public international law at the European University Institute. "Legally this case is quite clear. Bush does not enjoy immunity as a former head of state, and he has command responsibility for the decisions that were taken." What ever happened to that?

How quickly we forget that the USA harbors our own President Bush Jr, who has been charged with crimes against humanity for torture and other war crimes. That never worked and yet we think this is going to work, good luck! http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/feb/06/george-bush-trip-to-switzerland http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/11/canada-arrest-george-bush/ http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread652446/pg1 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65810.html