Comment Re:SOP for Min-Truth (Score 1) 1011
Hmmmm... I'm a researcher...(in a different field, of course...), and here is how we feel about recent research fraud (in pharmaceuticals)....
There is a good reason for having a clear record of who contributed to authorship. One reason is to give credit and another is to assign responsibility. If there is fraudulent data contaminating the manuscripts, everyone concerned needs to be aware of the contributing author list. And the entire manuscripts are now appropriately suspect. Indeed, all data connected with this investigator are tainted by the mere suggestion of fraud.
(and of course some of us often question the ethics of some pharmaceutical companies.... can we not, as scientists, question the ethics of these climate researchers?)
I see a lot of 'mere suggestion' of fraud in these emails.