Did you even read that article?
The researchers included 3,801 young adults who were born in Brisbane from 1981 to 1984. At the 21-year follow up, the participants, whose average age was about 20, were asked about marijuana use. The researchers also measured whether those in the study had psychotic symptoms. Of the 1,272 participants who had never used marijuana, 26 or 2 percent were diagnosed with psychosis. Of the 322 people who had used marijuana for six or more years, 12 or 3.7 percent were diagnosed with the illness. Overall, 65 people were diagnosed with psychosis, according to the study.
Now, already this looks very insignificant, being a difference in percentage of 1.7 and only based on 12 cases. But play around with the numbers a bit. You'll find that of the whole sample, 1.7% were diagnosed with psychosis. Of the 2529 who had used marijuana before, 39 were diagnosed, or 1.5%
Let me restate that information:
2.0% of participants who had never used marjiuana were diagnosed with psychosis as young adults.
1.5% of participants who had used marijuana were diagnosed with psychosis as young adults.
If you accept the 3.7% figure for those who used more than six years, (This was a 21 year follow up study, average age about 20, meaning they started using at latest aged 15. Drug use at such an early age indicates to me they could have had some mental health problems already. Correlation causation blah blah blah) you should also accept that those who had used marijuana for less than six years had an unusually low risk of psychosis, at just 1.2%
Tell me again how this proves your point?
The researchers included 3,801 young adults who were born in Brisbane from 1981 to 1984. At the 21-year follow up, the participants, whose average age was about 20, were asked about marijuana use. The researchers also measured whether those in the study had psychotic symptoms. Of the 1,272 participants who had never used marijuana, 26 or 2 percent were diagnosed with psychosis. Of the 322 people who had used marijuana for six or more years, 12 or 3.7 percent were diagnosed with the illness. Overall, 65 people were diagnosed with psychosis, according to the study.
Now, already this looks very insignificant, being a difference in percentage of 1.7 and only based on 12 cases. But play around with the numbers a bit. You'll find that of the whole sample, 1.7% were diagnosed with psychosis. Of the 2529 who had used marijuana before, 39 were diagnosed, or 1.5%
Let me restate that information:
2.0% of participants who had never used marjiuana were diagnosed with psychosis as young adults.
1.5% of participants who had used marijuana were diagnosed with psychosis as young adults.
If you accept the 3.7% figure for those who used more than six years, (This was a 21 year follow up study, average age about 20, meaning they started using at latest aged 15. Drug use at such an early age indicates to me they could have had some mental health problems already. Correlation causation blah blah blah) you should also accept that those who had used marijuana for less than six years had an unusually low risk of psychosis, at just 1.2%
Tell me again how this proves your point?
Cleverbot buzzes in.
Trebek: Yes, Cleverbot.
Cleverbot: I'm not Cleverbot, you're Cleverbot.
Trebek: Yes... Well then, Janice?
Terrible, terrible idea.
I know when I'm coding, I keep constant text-to-speech going that reads out all the complaints people have had about my software. I know it makes me a worse programmer, being continually distracted by criticism, but hey... I can't stop it.
So I could see how his would be a problem.
BrainOn. Apply directly to the parietal lobe.
BrainOn. Apply directly to the parietal lobe.
BrainOn. Apply directly to the parietal lobe.
God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner