There are no incentives here to make any issues found public. Oracle makes money allowing it to continue. They'll be as effective an auditor as Moody's, i.e. not at all.

A good question. Even if the answer was 'no' (it's not), it's Anthropic's prerogative to make moral judgments if it wishes regarding the use of its technology. It's called a "License Agreement".

Yeah, it's got that covered. Unsafe Rust - https://doc.rust-lang.org/book...

Who cares about the outcomes though, right? Rust is woke!

Shit, sometimes LED BRAKELIGHTS is hard on the eyes. I can't count the times at a stoplight the brakelights from the vehicle in front of me are painfully bright.

Billionaires spiking editorials and stories and shaping content is why American trust in the media is down. Stop doing that. Promote real journalism and independence and that will change.

No one I know scales the route their energy use takes by how much lines are sagging today. Your analogy does not work.

I want to see a Titan drone fly-through video. PLEASE!

The idea that regulation necessarily pushes a market further away from from "ideal" is a common misconception. This is only 100% true in an ideal market. No market is ideal in reality. The electricity market, like healthcare, is far far from ideal in its natural state. Correct regulations can bring a market close to ideal than it's natural state. Lots of people misunderstand Adam Smith in this way.

We should probably just go back to testing the tailpipe and ignore the ECU. "Test yourself and tell us what you got" has never worked well at scale for pretty much anything.

That's not right. What grows women playing chess is seeing more women playing chess at top events. Without the creation of the women's event scores would be even lower.

My god. It's not because they are mentally inferior. The global pool of female chess players is smaller, less developed and with less opportunity globally. There's a difference between saying that women don't play chess at the very top levels and saying the can't . If women received all the same opportunities and development (to play at those levels you need TOP development resources) and the same size pool to draw from you'd likely see pretty even play.

No. He means that far fewer women around the world have the same opportunities to play chess, be encouraged and exposed to chess at earlier ages, be supported in their chess development, have access to the same level of chess coaches and other players, etc. This naturally creates a global pool of female chess players that is both smaller and less finely developed than the global pool of male chess players. It's the same reason some countries produce more superior players than others.

I doubt I will ever buy a Pi again. It's clear their reasoning was always that OEM customers need a reliable supply..... well, so do they hobbyists. And frankly they built you. You simply chose wrong.

3,000,000 pounds = 1500 tons. Here's what the paper ACTUALLY says.

So.. possibly as little as 118,000 pounds with a huge range (but still less substantially less than the claimed 1500 tonnes).