Comment Re:Smash their Ring cameras? (Score 1) 41
So no, I won't be smashing my Ring camera. We need these things because some people no longer do the right thing even when you've got them on video. I used to wonder why almost everyone in Russia seemed to have a dashcam - now I completely understand why.
I think you misunderstood the issue. The problem isn't the camera or the footage it captures. The problem is access it provides to 3rd parties.
At basic level:
1. Other parties make money off of your investment and you get nothing in return.( unless your argue it brings neighborhood security)
2. You haven't consented to yourself & your family to be under surveillance and I suppose Law Enforcement no longer needs a warrant to watch your/s movements.
3. Not that I have heard about this, but hypothetically if a 3rd person is charged based on video captured from your camera, are you in any way liable for any lawsuits for undue surveillance or will that evidence be even admissible as the *alleged perpetrator* had nothing to do with you...
I think I am getting carried away in this though process.
Back to my original point, Problem with Ring camera as far as I am concerned is based on my experience... I have one that I recently removed before all this commotion. My reason, it didn't allow me to access the video stream. One had to subscribe to ring service if they want recording, or use Ring's mobile/web app to watch live stream. I wanted neither. I replaced it with Tapo doorbell with chime. It can do everything that Ring does, however it now feed into my NVR(zoneminder) because it has ONVIF/RTSP etc. It also came with door chime. In other words, at least after initial connection, it doesn't need any Internet connection to function. My NVR is configured to capture on motion, hence any activity is captured locally and directly accesible.