Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:How patronizing! (Score 1) 810

Vegans are not a protected class.

Technically the board would have to consist of a correct proportion based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, veteran status, and citizenship.

So on a board of 10, you'll need a 24-year-old white christian female hetero non-disabled citizen, a 33-year-old black male bi non-disabled citizen, a 19-year-old white female hetero disabled immigrant, an 18-year-old agnostic male hetero non-disabled citizen, a 20-year-old hispanic female jewish hetero citizen, a 58-year-old white ... and so on.

Comment Re:For certain values of "basic needs" (Score 1) 1116

Basic income means you get the money regardless of whether you work. i.e. if you work, you still get the basic income.

So in your example, you're working 40 hours a week for $2k/yr? Sure, you should quit. But if you make $32k/yr at your job, you'd have $62k/yr to work with then ($32k from the job, $30k from BI).

Comment Re:First World Problems (Score 1) 46

They run on Lipos (but you're not wrong since Lipos are really Lithium-Ion Polymer and chemically nearly identical but come in "pouches" instead of rigid containers. Also you can run quads well over 500mm size off of Li-Ion. Almost all quads are electric because electric motors can control their speed very accurately. Gas motors are not so good at that, and so most gas-powered quads run their props at constant speed and instead vary the pitch of their props, complicating the system significantly.

About 9 controls... you can actually map more than that if you use a custom mix to make switches only take up part of a signal. Your throttle, aileron, rudder, elevator each take up one full channel because they are not on-off but can vary in strength. Most people just set up switches to take up an entire channel but you can make switches take up half a channel, or even a quarter of a channel, because the data they are sending is so simple (on/off, or hi/mid/low). So with an 8 channel receiver/transmitter, you could control throttle, aileron, rudder, elevator, a knob, and 6+ switches.

And yes, this is already partially the case. All quadcopters have flight controllers which run algorithms to determine how much each motor should be spun based on the inputs from the human. There are many different firmwares for these flight controllers, and pretty much all implement a PID system (or offer you the ability to choose from multiple different PID algorithms). PID essentially just means how the controller calculates values to send to the ESCs and how much it tries to self-level in various regards.

Comment Re:Just in time to be obsolete (Score 0) 74

Just because it will eventually become obsolete doesn't mean there isn't a benefit in offering it and using it for some time. Over the years, cars have come with many different ways of getting music. How many of them are obsolete now? This would be a great way of getting a larger variety of music to your car (in addition to the many other uses). Pandora, Songza, the 100 other music services. Potentially access to your own media server to play music.
  • 8-Track
  • AM Radio
  • Tape Deck
  • FM Radio
  • CD Player
  • MP3 CD Player
  • XM/Sirius Radio
  • USB (for iPods usually)
  • Bluetooth

Comment LED Bulbs (Score 0) 1146

I bought a bunch of 8.5W (50W) equivalent bulbs online for $5 each. Not exactly breaking the bank there. They also have a nice color tone (3000K). The only down side it they take about half a second to come on when you flip the light switch, which took a bit to get used to. The price is really coming down. A lifetime of 30,000 hours too. They are also still available at that price. I just checked.

Comment Re:communications system? (Score 1) 149

My guess is that, at least initially, a driver will be required to be in the drivers seat at all times ready to override any actions taken by the car

At which point, WTF is the point of the self driving car?

If I need to be paying attention every second in case the computer does something stupid (and need to be able to anticipate every point at which it could do something stupid), it will require as much or more attention as if I was driving anyway.

I have no interest in a self driving car, and I certainly wouldn't pay for the privilege. If I wanted that, I could take the bus or the train.

I just don't see people actually wanting this technology, and since we'll never convert all of the cars on the road to this system, it means at best a fraction of your cars are self driving and playing by one set of rules -- while the rest of your drivers are doing the same random shit they do now.

This has always struck me as a technology which nobody actually wants.

It's like so many of these 'futurist' things which are impractical, will be too expensive, and which will never happen. This is a research project which might have some applications ... but which will never be practical for widespread use.

As Joshua Shaffer said... there are many, many people who have 45+ minute commutes. Those commutes could be spent doing leisure activities, chatting with friends/family, doing work, or even sleeping. It would also open up more people to taking longer commutes because that time is no longer wasted driving a car. Finally, you wouldn't even have to OWN the car. A pool of cars could be shared by people with dissimilar schedules.

Slashdot Top Deals

The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what you want. -- D. Cohen

Working...