Oh no they'll have to make better printers, how terrible for the consumer
Oh no they'll have to make better printers, how terrible for the consumer
Those aren't errors in the GPS, but the data it's working with.
I'm curious what you'd rank as an 'error in the GPS'. I completely glossed over other classes of 'error'; such as the GPS guessing which way you are facing on a road when you start a trip so you drive six feet and then it recalculates a new route based on the fact that you are going the other direction but that's just 'bad data too'. Or then there are the times its positional reckoning is off -- so it tells you to turn but you are actually a block away from where it thinks you are but that's just 'bad data' too.
Are those errors in the GPS, Or in the data its working from...it seems to be a distiction without a difference to me.
We validate what the GPS is telling us to do, but we don't ignore it's instructions and plan our own path. If one can't turn left, they pass the turn and wait for the GPS to figure things out.
As often as not, it simply reroutes you around the block back to the same intersection you couldn't use the first time. If you are lucky it'll at least have you approach it from a new angle so you can legally turn... i've been unlucky on many occasions. And if the road is simply closed for construction or something you are boned when it does that.
If you can't get in the correct lane in time, again, no panic, just keep driving until the GPS recalculates.
Yeah, that's usually where the GPS starts insisting you make illegal U-turns at major intersections, or emergency vehicle access roads, etc...
Anyone who has been navigated by gps system though knows they make mistakes all the time. from failing to be sufficiently clear, to directing you to make a left turn across a busy 9 lane highway, to sending you down a side-street with speedbumps instead of the main street one block over, to telling you to turn left at 3pm at an intersection that is only legal to turn left at after 6:30pm... to pulling a u-turn on a divided highway...etc etc.
I don't dispute you though... because people DO seem to turn their brains off, but it makes no sense because we KNOW the computer can screw up too and will.
Heh, the under-staffed supreme court the president still needs to appoint a judge into. Talk about a farce... where you get to appoint the judge who judges you.
Your quite right, flying is a PITA and a huge waste of time in general.
But sometimes, no, a video call just doesn't mean a fraction of what 'boots on the ground' means when you want to close a deal; or otherwise make an appearance.
And also for personal reasons... I know lots of people who have made 5 hour flights to attend a wedding or funeral and then flown back home the same day too. And getting some work done on the plane was part of making that 'work'.
Presumably the martians will pay for it.
Day trips to Jordan? Short hops to Turkey? Did you even read the summary?
Did you even read the title?
"UK Flight Ban On Devices To Be Announced"
From the UK, Turkey and Jordan are well within the range of a day trip for a businessman. You can catch a 6am flight, be in Turkey for lunch, attend meetings; do dinner with a vendor, and then fly home again in the evening. Or perhaps fly from Turkey to Italy or vienna, crash in a hotel, and attend a 2 day conference there before flying home... really this isn't exactly implausible.
small personal space when they whip up their laptop to do that presentation they should have done 2 weeks ago in the office.
Or they flew into London for a 2 day conference, then had a dinner meeting blowing their evening; but they plan to catch up their email, and review tweak the presentation they DID write 2 weeks ago in the office that they are presenting to a supplier straight after they land and want it fresh in their head because that's what a prepared person would do.
First the airlines crow about giving us internet access on flights, and then they take away our laptops?
There was a time not all that long ago when laptops didn't exist and you couldn't do that kind of work anyway
Wha? Did you just watch a movie where they just drank cocktails and screwed flight attendants? Where are you getting your information? In the 'long-ago before-time' they had briefcases with paperwork in them, and they'd review presentations, read and annotate contracts, write notes, review financial reports and ledgers, and do all sorts of work while in flight...
Taking away laptops in 2017 actually gives them less ability to do work in flight than they could have done in 1970 because now the contracts and presentations, charts, and graphs are on the laptop instead of in a folder.
It's not like coach...
Wait... What? So first class and business class are allowed to have their laptops; its just coach that has to sit there twiddling their thumbs. And what are you talking about... a modern ultrabook is lighter and less bulky then the folders of paper etc people used to carry around.
Wow... just nuts.
Everyone doing short hops / day trips for business is going to howl... that's basically their entire luggage. One laptop bag. Now they have to all pack them and check them? That's a huge waste of their time.
And everyone doing long hauls and bigger trips - the laptop is the entertainment for the cabin, to get work done in the cabin, and above all nobody wants to put their several thousand dollars relatively fragile laptop in checked baggage where the TSA gorillas and baggage handlers will either play frisbee with it or just steal it.
How is anyone ok with putting up with this nonsense?
There's a TON of digital currencies and other schemes and ventures out there; say you bought 100 'shares' of each of them, your 'bitcoin gains'
When the winning move is to bet on the right scheme/venture...well... good luck with that.
If you can do that reliably, let us know which penny stock or startup will be a billion dollar company in a few years. Because the odds are about as good.
Some of us get to have that every single day on our OS, and the sky has not fallen on us yet. In fact, it works great.
So yes. Yes, we do really, really want that. We have tried it, it works, it's much nicer, and we want it.
hopefully the microwave wont be able to call home
Ummm... it has a microwave transmitter built in. It doesn't need wifi... it can talk to the satellites!!
The only thing new about these "drones" is that someone else did all the hard work already.
Which means that instead of a handful of enthusiasts who have spent large portions of their lives in the RC aircraft community it's now hundreds of thousands of random idiots who got one under the christmas tree who know absolutely nothing at all about the RC aircraft hobby and community, who haven't even read the owners manual...
Yeah, "So whats the difference?" Right??
Like getting to the end of a race track cannot ever happen. To get to the end you first have to get 1/2 the way there. To get to the half way point, you first must get to the 1/4 point. To get there, you must first get to the 1/8 point. You have an infinite number of steps to get from the start to the end so there are always more steps between and you can never complete it
This is one of Zeno's Paradoxes and it is shown to be false basically because of calculus.
"Basically because of calculus" is the most hand-wavy excuse. The REASON you can reach the end of a race track is that the time to complete 'each 1/2 step' converges to zero. What if we added some 'overhead' so the time per step didn't converge to zero... then what happens? Say we add the requirement that you stop for 0.1 seconds each time you traverse another "1/2 of the remainder", now how long will it take to cross the finish line?
Answer: You won't finish. Now it WILL take infinite time.
So saying you cannot complete an infinite number of steps in a finite amount of time is wrong!
If the iterations converge to requiring zero time to complete then maybe you can complete an infinite series of them in a finite amount of time. Otherwise... nope. Forget it.
"Part of the problem with Teamviewer is that after being installed it usually runs after every startup so those security holes are always open to anything that can get as far as your PC."
Nope. That's only if you install the full teamviewer app; most people doing legitimate remote support with it with clients etc have the client run TeamViewerQS ("QS = QuickSupport); this (unlike the full teamviewer) only runs when it is explicitly run, only accepts incoming control sessions (intead of outgoing and meetings etc).
It also requires no additional licensing for commercial use; and allows for corporate branding etc
In my experience with it, virtually all vendors of software that use teamviewer for their remote support have give you the "QS" version.
You probably had some problem such as firewall software in the way which made such an otherwise utterly trivial task difficult
The reason a lot of people like TV more than VNC is that VNC pretty much always has "some problem such as firewall" that needs to be sorted out, and TV pretty much always just works.
So on the scale of 'simpler to setup and use' TV generally ranks as excellent, and VNC usually ranks as "Did Not Finish... due to 'some problem'."
plus there has been around twenty years to shake out the bugs.
Which is great, but it lacks a lot of features remote support technicians find useful. chat, file transfer, leave a note, etc. Not to mention getting it through some random clients firewall usually runs into "some problem" so it doesn't work and wasting time on 'firewall problems' to get VNC working usually takes long than the original problem would have.
The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst