Comment Metric vs Imperial (Score 1) 984
I'm starting to understand why it's so hard to introduce the metric system in countries using the imperial system. I've always thought it as rather silly, the metric system is a international standard and generally superior in our base 10 world, so why should it be so hard to switch over? Now I think I see why.
Emotionally I'm against the idea of starting to use kB, MB, GB, etc, in their SI meaning for computers. We have always used the base 2 definition for computers, why would we need to change, base 2 is native to computers so it makes sense, I know that a kB is 1024 bytes, I know why my 1 TB drive "lose" 61 GB. A small and elitist part of me even likes the fact that most don't know this, so I can "educate" them.
Thinking logically I can see why it is a good idea to switch over to SI even for computers, as others have already pointed out it is already used for a lot of things in computers, frequency, transfer rates, etc. Having different systems are just confusing and, as HD manufacturers have shown us, there's no need to in modern computers. Oh sure, a few percentage of us needs to know about the base 2:ness of computers, so that we can ensure that things line up correctly, but the wast majority never needs to know and is only confused when we insist that kilo is 1024, or perhaps even worse that 1024 is kibi (they'd just laugh at that).
In the end 1 TB and 931 GiB is the same number of bytes (well, close enough), just two different ways of writing the same thing, one that makes much more sense to the waste majority of people.
So logically I can see why this would be a good idea, emotionally, I don't think so. So yea, I understand now why introducing the metric system is such a hard thing to do.