They get special treatment and financial support because they were, quite recently, the victims of terrible human rights violations; and in some cases, still are. Those violations have a trickle-down effect. The current generation, even if not victimized directly, is still disadvantaged by their ancestry.

Further, on the one hand, you suggest that our standards of decency are wrong-minded (that we should not provide support to these people) but on the other subtly judge their ancestors by those same standards.

Perhaps you just want to have your cake and eat it too, as long as the pigmented people don't have a slice.

So use a whitelist, not a blacklist, for your blocking policies.

Or do the other smart thing and don't allow regular users to have admin privileges.

Does being able to see the actors' pores increase your enjoyment of the dialogue and the story that much?

Why do you need a GUI on a server in the first place?

So roll your own RSS feed aggregator.

Personally, I find that Selfoss is a fantastic replacement for Google Reader.

Respectfully disagree; see abortion clinic bombings for murder as an expression of Christian faith.

What happens if the course is no longer offered, or the prof no longer teaches it?

FYI, Google Play Music, Movies, Books, et al are used to view media as well as portals to the Play store.

Slimier? Gros.

A better comparison yet might be an oil painting vs a digital painting.

I'm sticking with SL because Spaces and Expose are much more functional than Mission Control, I'm not coerced into giving my data to Apple's cloud, and it's just faster due to less bloat.

Maybe talk to the kid, determine if this GAME represents novelty or intention? Talk to his teachers, see if he remotely poses an actual, tangible threat? Get the teachers to talk to his classmates? Lift one fucking finger before laying criminal charges on a child?

I imagine multiple lasers can alleviate some I/O concerns. There used to be 72X CD drives that used split lasers to read 7 tracks simultaneously. I imagine with modern tolerances, the same idea could be used for these optical discs.

I've taken enough evo-psych in University to see right through your bullshit. You're just spewing pseudo-scientific babble. You may as well be comparing the skull shapes of men and women to make your point, while ignoring inconsistencies in your internal logic.

If this were a matter of race, not gender, would your arguments still hold? Is it socially or morally acceptable to lump an entire demographic of people into one negative category and then refuse to acknowledge them as individuals outside of your bias?