There hasn't been a Friday night fight for a while - it looks like it's back. There used to be an article every week to inspire angry virgins to go around screaming SJW!!!!
Because it always a laugh when I'm blackmailed by a female co-worker threatening false reports because she's empowered by SJW workplace policies. The best time when one threatened charges against me unless I framed another co-worker she wanted to get. Such a laugh I must say. har har har You're such a genius comedian...
At a former employer I dated the HR person, which was an effective defense.
What are you getting on about? mutantSushi's comment seems to be to the polar -opposite- of the kind of blanket pronouncements and knee-jerk reactions SJWs are generally accused of.
Exactly. You've misunderstood. That figure of speech means the AC is agreeing with mutantSushi.
'Don't confuse with facts' is a figure of speech meaning roughly 'the complainer is too dumb to understand the explanation of their mistake' - but used when the complainer may know damn well they're wrong and are doing it anyway to make political/religious/social waves and/or to take advantage of an unbalanced playing field that will grant them the win though their wrong.
AC could have written 'Don't point out the glaring contradiction that invalidates the whole point to an SJW, that's mansplaining! (or internalized misogyny if mutantSushi is female - or one of the other 20 er 50 er 92 genders)
and fascism is the corner of the resultant grid where statism meets capitalism, the worst of both worlds. Neither state socialism nor libertarian capitalism are its opposite; libertarian socialism is.
Only 16 years from the end of the 20th century and you think the corner where statism meets capitalism is the worst? Really? Not where statism meets socialism?
Do the deaths of little people not matter as long as the great leap forward is achieved? Do you think the statist socialist places weren't doing socialism hard enough, or will you make a 'no true Scottsman' argument and claim they weren't doing it right? It's just that every single time... every. time... every. single. time... it ends in rivers of blood. The useful idealists are liquidated the moment they object.
So with more than 100 million dead between Mao's great leap forward and Stalin's war on the Kulaks and subsequent starvation of the Ukraine (Russia deliberately shipped food *out* during a famine) exactly how big does the death toll have to be? 5x the worst of fascism? 10x? Are you pining for your own Hundred Flowers campaign so you'll be free to achieve your vision afterwards? Have you 'seen the future, and it works!'? Did your primary education include Solzhenitsyn or the Hundred Flowers? The substantive answer is that it's damning of the political ideology that's in vogue, isn't it?
Statism is a real world slippery slope. Psychological manipulation techniques for whole societies work, and are well known. Those two amplify each others power. Statism has to be stopped before it reaches critical mass, but the point where that happens is only visible afterwards. You have to steer well clear of the avalanche area because you can't stop it. The society wide version of lynch mobs that result if you don't make actual mobs seem friendly. That's the lesson of the 20th century. Avoid this or there will be rivers of blood - unless you try really, really hard to do it right this time - then there will be oceans of blood instead.
Remember: use logout to logout.