Comment Re:Softball questions. (Score 1) 1011
I believe any Ron Paul supporter could answer these 'softballs'!!!
Yes illegal immigration is harmful to both economy and culture. Americans should not have to compete for jobs with people who are here illegally. Much of the illegals wages are sent back to their homeland and with the current level of illegals, it has a tremendous effect on the economy at all levels, local, state, and federal. One of the cultures of America is that we are governed by the rule of law, the Constitution being the 'law of the land'. To support illegal immigration subverts that staple of our culture.
An aggressive enforcement of immigration laws is needed to quell the existing problem. One effective way to dramatically reduce illegal immigration is to have our military guarding our borders. To completely put an end to illegal immigration is really not even an achievable possibility for any nation. The measures above would serve to keep illegal immigration in check and at levels that would have a very minute effect on the nations economy or our cultural values. A country without borders is no country at all, immigration most certainly should be restricted, as provided in our Constitution.
It was never stated, nor implied, that America and Americans were not attacked on 9/11/2001! It was stated that it was not the American people or the fact that we are free and prosperous that invited the attacks. It was the US governments foreign policy, hijacked by a handful of neo-con.'s, the reason we were attacked. It was our military presence over there,on the Arabian peninsula for the past decades that invited the attacks. It was attributed to blowback for our decades long policies towards middle eastern countries,this was also the conclusion reached by our own CIA and the 911 commission report.
Americans should never be restricted from voting for any reason.
As the Constitution clearly states 'congress shall pass no law restricting the people's right to bear arms'. Certainly having a neigbor developing/possessing a nuclear bomb would infringe upon the rights of others to feel/be safe in their homes and property. The same holds true for other 'weapons of mass destruction',which must be dealt with at the local level on an individual basis. If whatever it may be, poses an immediate threat to the rights/property of another,under no circumstances should it be allowed.Including threat(s) posed by our government/militaries possessing/storing of such devices.
The fed. government has way over exceeded its authority!To force the government to operate within the limits as proscribed in the Constitution,we must recognize a strict interpretation of the document and immediately abolish any/all laws that are not within Constitutional limits.The congressional oath of office must be taken seriously and strictly enforced.
Reducing Americas dependence on foreign oil should be left to an unrestricted free market.The government has no authority to influence technological developements in the creation or supplying of the energy our nation needs/uses.The same holds true for any technological advances,regardless of the economic impact they may or not have on the nation.The free markets must be allowed to operate unimpeded from the forces of government regulations not empowered by the Constitution.
Equal access to healthcare should certainly be the right of each individual but the costs for that care also the responsibility of each individual.An American population unburdoned with the current income tax laws/obligations would certainly provide an enormous increase of revenue to our current charitable organizations as well as increase the number of such organizations.Those currently dependent on government programs or who have been forcibly required to invest into such government programs,should certainly be provided with the service(s) as promised or financially reimbursed for what has already been paid plus the going rate of interest and inflation adjustments.
Imminent domain simply for gaining increased tax revenues violates individual property rights..The degree of importance should certainly be the deciding factor in determining the value of the property involved with the final decision being the properties rightful owner(s).In the rare circumstance that involves a national defense issue is the only justifiable reason for invoking such a policy on an individual not willing to come to a reasonable agreement.
I believe these answers would closely resemble the opinions of RP...Please3 let me know if/where I may have botched it...lol
Have a wonderful day my fellow patriots!!!
Yes illegal immigration is harmful to both economy and culture. Americans should not have to compete for jobs with people who are here illegally. Much of the illegals wages are sent back to their homeland and with the current level of illegals, it has a tremendous effect on the economy at all levels, local, state, and federal. One of the cultures of America is that we are governed by the rule of law, the Constitution being the 'law of the land'. To support illegal immigration subverts that staple of our culture.
An aggressive enforcement of immigration laws is needed to quell the existing problem. One effective way to dramatically reduce illegal immigration is to have our military guarding our borders. To completely put an end to illegal immigration is really not even an achievable possibility for any nation. The measures above would serve to keep illegal immigration in check and at levels that would have a very minute effect on the nations economy or our cultural values. A country without borders is no country at all, immigration most certainly should be restricted, as provided in our Constitution.
It was never stated, nor implied, that America and Americans were not attacked on 9/11/2001! It was stated that it was not the American people or the fact that we are free and prosperous that invited the attacks. It was the US governments foreign policy, hijacked by a handful of neo-con.'s, the reason we were attacked. It was our military presence over there,on the Arabian peninsula for the past decades that invited the attacks. It was attributed to blowback for our decades long policies towards middle eastern countries,this was also the conclusion reached by our own CIA and the 911 commission report.
Americans should never be restricted from voting for any reason.
As the Constitution clearly states 'congress shall pass no law restricting the people's right to bear arms'. Certainly having a neigbor developing/possessing a nuclear bomb would infringe upon the rights of others to feel/be safe in their homes and property. The same holds true for other 'weapons of mass destruction',which must be dealt with at the local level on an individual basis. If whatever it may be, poses an immediate threat to the rights/property of another,under no circumstances should it be allowed.Including threat(s) posed by our government/militaries possessing/storing of such devices.
The fed. government has way over exceeded its authority!To force the government to operate within the limits as proscribed in the Constitution,we must recognize a strict interpretation of the document and immediately abolish any/all laws that are not within Constitutional limits.The congressional oath of office must be taken seriously and strictly enforced.
Reducing Americas dependence on foreign oil should be left to an unrestricted free market.The government has no authority to influence technological developements in the creation or supplying of the energy our nation needs/uses.The same holds true for any technological advances,regardless of the economic impact they may or not have on the nation.The free markets must be allowed to operate unimpeded from the forces of government regulations not empowered by the Constitution.
Equal access to healthcare should certainly be the right of each individual but the costs for that care also the responsibility of each individual.An American population unburdoned with the current income tax laws/obligations would certainly provide an enormous increase of revenue to our current charitable organizations as well as increase the number of such organizations.Those currently dependent on government programs or who have been forcibly required to invest into such government programs,should certainly be provided with the service(s) as promised or financially reimbursed for what has already been paid plus the going rate of interest and inflation adjustments.
Imminent domain simply for gaining increased tax revenues violates individual property rights..The degree of importance should certainly be the deciding factor in determining the value of the property involved with the final decision being the properties rightful owner(s).In the rare circumstance that involves a national defense issue is the only justifiable reason for invoking such a policy on an individual not willing to come to a reasonable agreement.
I believe these answers would closely resemble the opinions of RP...Please3 let me know if/where I may have botched it...lol
Have a wonderful day my fellow patriots!!!
