Not My opinion, It's the Judges opinion, the only opinion that counts here.
Until they are restrained from doing it nationwide that simply isn't true.
Funny you trust ICE's word over the courts.
Here you go again. I never said anything like that, nor do I approve of this. I am merely discussing a fear of why they may be right.
A bounty hunters authority to apprehend is often granted by the contract between the bondsman and the defendant. -pointless example, do more reading, you agreed to the apprehension methods when you took the money from the bail bondsman.
It isn't pointless when they do the exact same thing applying for a visa. Ask Seamus Culleton, the tourist visa program requires you to give up your rights to appeal detention and deportation. You waive a lot of rights to come here. And bounty hunters used to be able to go into anyone's home if they had reason to believe the fugitive was in there. It's really only in the last few decades that most states restricted that after multiple abuses, some resulting in death.
Pinkerton agents used to do the same, as did the Texas Rangers. Yeah, it's stopped now, but what was their legal justification to do it in the first place?
You seem to really want to strip my rights away, you have lots of justifications for why we need to have less rights.
And again, you are really on a roll today.
Is that like your go to word for when you have nothing intelligent to say? I've kind of noticed that people who do that are the very first to want to apply the boot to others. Regardless, I'm done with you. I made the mistake of replying to a dog and now I need to check for fleas.
