Everything increases GDP. Increase in the number of car accidents? GDP increases. Companies suing each other over stupid bullshit? GDP increases. Recovering from massive weather events that just destroyed half your city? GDP increases. Cleaning up that oil spill? GDP increases.
All those circular investments by "AI" companies? GDP increases.
It's a bullshit number/concept.
Almost none could recall what they had written immediately after submitting their work.
Ummm... that's because they didn't write it. (And it's also not "their work".)
The move is expected to cost 330 million kroner ($51 million) a year.
Not really. It's not costing the government anything.
It's potentially saving the people 330 million kroner a year though.
Software cannot hallucinate.
Enough with anthropomorphizing these things. It's not a hallucination - it's an error.
Does Firefox sell your personal data?
Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise.
So regardless of the legalese & its interpretation, this kinda sums up what they want to do...
You might think so, but they explicitly removed this:
Does Firefox sell your personal data?
Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise.
That kinda sums it up...
before switching to another mode of communication when they realize no human is part of the conversation.
They didn't "realize" anything.
For the love of Odin stop anthropomorphizing these things.
There goes Canada leading from behind again.
Wait for everyone else to go after them first, then pile on.
...computer software produces erroneous results.
Let's stop anthropomorphizing these language models please.
They don't think, they don't reason, they don't "make things up", and they don't hallucinate.
Great!
Do Big Tech next!
Or, you know - address the root cause and stop all the crazy mergers & acquisitions...
Citation?
This is from Wikipedia:
The film began as a 45-minute 16mm student project with a final budget of six thousand dollars.
which references 2 books.
I think it's just poorly worded in the article. They "created a spaceship tale for a graduation project", and it was "[m]ade for $60,000 by film school students", but these are not the same film. The student film cost $6k, the publicly released one was $60k.
The "micro-budget" was $6k, not $60k.
$60k would have been quite a bit of money for student film!
Valve aren't defining "AI technology" (at least in their post), so it could be almost anything. I suspect they may be targetting the "Generative AI" fad, but they don't say so directly.
Any kind of content (art/code/sound/etc) created with the help of AI tools during development.
That's almost everything these days depending on how you define it.
Without knowing what kind of AI & the scope, the disclosure seems mostly useless.
All the simple programs have been written.
