Re:Why Switch To Borland's Turbo Line? (Score 1)

Best of luck to Borland. I have fond memories all the way back to Borland C++ 3.x for Windows

I also have fond memories of the OWL (Object Windows Library) which, I thought, was better than the MFC back in the Win 3.x days.
I am currently working on a project where BC++ is the mandatory compiler because it is for a 16 bit (80186) DOS-like embedded system.
Hopefully they will support 16 bit targets with a decent STL. The STL in BC 5.02 uses a lot of memory (too much for embedded systems IMHO).