>n than the general argument against equality.

No.

>Trying to make us all "equal" has resulted in millions of deaths

It has not. No Stalin didnt kill people because of 'equality', he killed him to increase his own personal power. I mean DUH. Yes, individuals have differing levels of ability, for instance your intellectual capability seems below average because you're trying to justify melanin levels as the source of ability, which is a convenient way to understand the world if you're not too bright.

wrong. those 'losers' are currently doing stuff like harvesting all the food I eat and painting my apartment building. cant wait to see how much prices skyrocket after conservatives implement their 'no brown people' immigration plans

people working on this are doing a much cooler job than mine

no we use per-capita math because we are, like, smart and stuff

Actually the cause is conservative policies, namely low taxes on the rich, bankrupting government, and lack of gun control. you dimwit.

oh look, a dips**** take from an internet troll. SF actually has *great* city services and low violent crime, and the reason downtown is empty is something called 'work from home' you might be familiar with

>STEM grads on average are much more centrist, and that is speaking as a centrist STEM grad. I am also speaking as a STEM grad and having worked with them for 30 years, the idea that they are more conservative (oops I mean 'centrist') than average is completely laughable. I dont know what bubble you exist in. Smart STEM people are at the forefront of social and political evolution and not on its trailing conservative edge where grifters try to convince the poors to protect the interests of the wealthy.

The idea that STEM grads with advanced degrees are all voting MAGA is kinda hilarious and excellent proof you dont know any such people and have never worked near any.

I agree with the article, however there's a lot of anti-science people out there who will twist this into 'all theories are unreliable, therefore my disbelief is valid'

Yeah I think both you and Musk are pretty ok with speech that gets people killed. Like the Jan 6 Trump stuff. Or anti-vax info. No need to ban that, it's just some people you'll never know dying and stuff, which isnt as important as [Muh Speech] and [Freeedumb]!

Yawn, another false equivalency. Yes if every state that does something bad isnt immediately banned, they have no right to ban any individual. Great Point Sherlock. You'd make a fantastic 4chan CEO.

>They're just not getting kicked for Muh Hate Speech. Yeah I think both you and Musk are pretty ok with speech that gets people killed. Like the Jan 6 Trump stuff. No need to ban that, it's just some people you'll never know dying and stuff. >business with China and the Gulf Arab states, to the point of quickly acceding to their censorship demands. So this stuff isn't principle. yawn, another false equivalency. yes if every state that does something bad isnt bad, they have no right to ban any individual. great point sherlock.

I dont think Fred would've approved that facebook motto 'move fast and break things'

Been seeing this headline in tech news at least since the release of Windows Vista. Yeah mostly only new PCs will generally get a completely new OS version. The fact that every PC going back 15 years isnt instantly upgraded is hardly a huge surprise or a decisive indicator of failure

The Free Speech Movement was not about promoting speech that harms people, promotes Fascism, or social intolerance, so you're completely wrong.

I've taken classes from him and he would not be an interesting dinner guest. He publishes a ton but I can see how ethical considerations are completely off his radar.