Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Punishment based on victim, not crime (Score 1) 417

It isn't pretending, it is attempting to meet a standard. Humans always fall short of perfect standards and that is no secret, but that also doesn't mean we shouldn't continue to strive to achieve them. Your suggestion seems to be to give up on that standard and let every sentence be applied without *any* objective standard. It seems to me that your approach would actually end up achieving the opposite of what you want--without any generally agreed upon standard, all sentences would be wildly variable and satisfy even less people. So, yes, I can see why we disagree.

Comment Re:Punishment based on victim, not crime (Score 2, Insightful) 417

I dislike Palin as much as the next normal IQ American, but I can't agree with your end-justifies-the-means approach based on your heavily-stereotyped view of a particular group, especially since the reasoning is based on broad speculation and bigotry. It sounds like you are saying what the kid did should be punished based on some sliding scale that takes into account who the victim is and whether or not the victim was doing something you agree with. That sounds awfully subjective and impossible to translate into any population's diverse number of world-views.

Comment Should they? No. Is it a big deal? No. (Score 1) 1057

Ultimately, employers should be able to do what ever they believe will help them choose the best candidates, as long as it is within the law. But, remember that an interview is a two-way street... how the interviewer behaves and the expectations they reveal will tell you a great deal about the employer. You will have to decide for yourself if this is a company you would want to work. My sense is that the places that have asked me to test tend to want to treat IT professionals as a commodity, and thus not a place I want to work. If they can't field someone to talk with me to determine the depth of my knowledge then I usually see that as a problem.
Security

Mystery Malware Affecting Linux/Apache Web Servers 437

lisah writes "Reports are beginning to surface that some Web servers running Linux and Apache are unwittingly infecting thousands of computers, exploiting vulnerabilities in QuickTime, Yahoo! Messenger, and Windows. One way to tell if your machine is infected is if you're unable to create a directory name beginning with a numeral. Since details are still sketchy, the best advice right now is to take proactive steps to secure your servers. 'We asked the Apache Software Foundation if it had any advice on how to detect the rootkit or cleanse a server when it's found. According to Mark Cox of the Apache security team, "Whilst details are thin as to how the attackers gained root access to the compromised servers, we currently have no evidence that this is due to an unfixed vulnerability in the Apache HTTP Server." We sent a similar query to Red Hat, the largest vendor of Linux, but all its security team could tell us was that "At this point in time we have not had access to any affected machines and therefore cannot give guidance on which tools would reliably detect the rootkit."'"

Slashdot Top Deals

Term, holidays, term, holidays, till we leave school, and then work, work, work till we die. -- C.S. Lewis

Working...