I generally avoid most the car dependent suburban towns unless I have an explicit reason to be there. 55% of Americans live in the suburbs. Only 3% of those suburbs have train stations. I choose to live where walking and the train are viable ways to travel. My zip code has two train lines (express and trolley) with multiple stops. The town in the center of the zip code has tones of amenities and is pedestrian friendly. Yes, the train lines predate the rise of the automobile. The town was built for pedestrians, horse drawn carriages, and trains. Car dependent suburbia promote social isolation, higher per capital resources use, air pollution, and require the duplication of government There are even medium sized cities without any city train system in the USAlooking at you Kansas City. No for me.
On the other hand, my household still has two car, because we do live in America. There are many wild lands and small towns, mostly settled before the rise of the automobile or in the heart of natural wonder, worth visiting though.
People act like they have no options and are forced into things when the reality is that most people are lazy and would rather accept the status quo and complain than actually do anything to change. Don’t like living somewhere you need to jump into your car to go everywhere? Than don’t. There are alternatives. And enough people did something about it, less people would live in car dependent situations.
But back to the actual point, a motor bike is a motor bike regardless if the motor is electric, gas, propane, hydrogen, kerosene, vegetable oil, or diesel. It should be regulated as such.