Well, two points there. First, it's not the same way a human reads a novel. Second, a human doesn't "train" on a novel, because training implies learning to duplicate its structure. The only humans "training" on a novel and proceeding to write their own are what we call cut and dried plagiarists.

Cart before horse. "Evidence to say that left without clocks and relying exclusively on our our internal cycle" should be "Evidence to say that switching from our own internal cycle to clocks" - as the latter is the biological ground state, the former an arbitrary societal constraint. And the evidence is there: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a...

This isn't strictly true, if, for example, you sign up for a store loyalty card and as part of sign up terms it gives explicit consent.

"All the smart people were saying it". No, all the rich people were saying it, and all their sycophants were repeating it. A very different kettle of fish.

If you're able to do that (rip out the LLM-generated parts and use them) then LLM generated code is incompatible with the GPL. It's worth remembering that the GPL leverages strong copyright protection in order to be effective. It sounds like LLM code is pure poison.

This isn't novel, the underpants gnomes already attempted this business model.

Give them a choice between a wind farm or a nuclear reactor, and see which one they go for.

There's no law against getting children to smoke. We should not be criminalizing opinions.

Meanwhile, business owers who don't use robots won't get taxed and will keep lower prices, ultimately putting the robot owning businesses out of business. Without being pro- or anti- in this debate, obviously the point of the argument is to strike a balance in the taxation rate such that it remains competitive to keep a human in a role that would otherwise be replaced by a robot. Personally I was under the impression that most jobs that could be mechanised already had been; a lot of it sounds like either techno-utopian pipe dreams or FUD to keep the population from demanding higher wages.

It's funny that you should mention this. The conversation being had over robots is hardly new.

Presumably know-it-all clams contain pearls of wisdom?

As far as I'm aware, nobody has denied that Trumps (not the US president at the time) phones were tapped as part of an investigation into his shady links with Russia. What is remarkable is his sudden claim without any supporting evidence or context that the then Whitehouse ordered a criminal investigation without any of the people responsible for performing the investigation knowing about it. Basically, it's childishly obvious as bullshit. In a burst of supreme hypocrisy, Trump was literally just last week wailing on the press for publishing articles without naming sources or revealing evidence. He has no sense of decency left whatsoever.

Well no, Wikileaks is Assange, and to Assange the enemy of his enemy is also an enemy. By revealing CIA hacking methods *now*, he is preventing the Trump government from making use of them. You have to understand that in his own words *his stated political goal* is to prevent conspiracies by breaking all trust between players. He will do anything to accomplish this goal, and it so happens that breaking trust between players in the western world *at the moment* currently aligns with modus operandi of Russian psychops. Therefore, when Russia is attacking the west, he will aid them. Never mind that destabilising the west makes way for the far, far worse murderous criminal Russian oligarchs to seize more power, that doesn't appear to have occured to him. Or maybe he really was turned by the Kremlin, but that would be pure speculation.

The KKK officially supported and continue to support Donald Trump's regime, but don't take my word for it, you can see for yourself.

No, this is demonstrably and logically false. If racism can only be taught then it would never have developed in the first place.