Re:Sound cards are irrelevant (Score 1)

I think you're skewing the numbers a bit to support your conclusion.

4% have 24", 5% have >24". That _doesn't_ mean 9% have 1920x1200 or more. TVs have many inches but not that many pixels. Also, not all 24" is 1920x1200. 1920x1080 24.1" monitors may be entered as 24", but would show up in the 1.39% 'other' resolutions. Number of inches is probably user specified too, so there is probably some errors in the data.

Skewing the numbers the other way, the 5% are TV owners and 3.68% (2.29+1.39) have 24"-resolution (1920xsome or other). That leaves a difference of 0.32%, which are those that entered the data wrongly.

So I wouldn't say the numbers are bullshit and WAY out of wack, but I'll agree there is some weirdness. It would have been nice to have access to the raw data. Then you could answer questions like 'What resolutions did those that said 24" report?'.

Still, inaccuracies and all, it's an interesting list.