Re:Oh, gotta rant, gotta rant on this one... (Score 1)

Well...there's the point. It doesn't seem that he did in fact donate it. He agreed to work out pricing at a later date, and then the sherrif's office shut him out whenever he tried to bring the subject up.

Let's reverse the situation: You buy a product on finance. You have basically agreed to pay for it later. Whenever the comapny you're financing through tries ot contact you to discuss payment, you tune them out or make up some kind of excuse. What would happen in this situation? You would have whatever it was your purchased taken away from you, wouldn't you? Well that's exactly what Pat has done here. He provided a service under finance. When he tried to discuss payment with the sherrif's office, they shut him out, so, after a period of time (a period that displayed a level of patience that no financial institution would have) he took the product back. Under the reverse situation, you would have no way of getting your purchase back. In the real-life case, the opposite is happening. How would oyu like to be imprisoned for being a nice guy?