Comment Re:Unpossible!11! (Score 4, Informative) 132
And yet it's Iran who can't get any oil out while other countries export millions of barrels a day.
They don't have to. They get $2 Million for each ship that crosses the Strait of Hormuz.
Is that also why they have more inflation per week that America has per year?
They had that inflation since more than a decade, and they did not crumble. Inflation is something a free market economy cares about, but a dictatorship does not have to.
Comment Re:Unpossible!11! (Score 4, Insightful) 132
Comment Re:Induced demand is BS (Score 1) 149
Comment Re: Its very puzzling, isn't it? (Score 3, Interesting) 96
A few rainy days and the economics go sideways.
It does not.
As Google did, you can also do the math. Duane Arnold had a net power output of 581 MW or 14 GWh output per day. To store 14 GWh of electricity right now, you have to pay about US$560 Mio (or $40 per kWh). With the 1.9 billion dollar grant, you could build enough capacity for four days of continuous rain. And differently than a nuclear power plant, this battery capacity could do power arbitrage, charging when electricity is cheap and provide it when prices are high, generating revenue and at the same time damping electricity price pikes and stabilizing the grid.
Comment Re:Induced demand is BS (Score 1) 149
The same happens to businesses. A business incorporated at A might think twice about offering services at B, if roundtrip times are X. But if an additional highway lowers the travel times to X-t, it becomes a business case, until the additional demand has eaten up the advantage, and we are back at X times.
Comment Re: It's all about navigation, not politics (Score 1) 274
Comment Re: I hate it here (Score 2) 274
Comment Re: I know its not an original idea (Score 1) 29
Comment Re:I know its not an original idea (Score 3, Informative) 29
Comment Re:I know its not an original idea (Score 3, Informative) 29
And they can rule out interaction of Dark Matter with itself on a large scale of magnitudes, e.g. everything above the Weak Force.
Comment Re:A republic, if you can keep it... (Score 1, Troll) 233
Several decades without real improvement of the standard of living for the average citizen has shaken the support for Democracy, because people feel Democracy has failed them. They no longer insists on upholding the rule of Law, because there is the impression that the Law benefits the wrong people. Decades of sentiment, reiterated in countless movies, novels, documentations and opinion pieces, have consolidated to the general view that government officials and politicians are either incompetent, grifters or blocked by countless laws and regulations to do something for you -- and this view is now so ingrained that people don't expect anything anymore from Democracy and are ready to try something else. The U.S. has broken the promise of your pursuit of happiness, and the pundits explain to you it's your fault. Throw out the rule of Law, throw out the balances of power, throw out elections in general when all they apparently do is benefiting the wrong persons.
Comment Re:A republic, if you can keep it... (Score 1) 233
It objectively wasn't. The system assumed those morons wouldn't be self-serving grifters. Modern politics is evidence that this was not considered in the design.
Actually, it was. The whole point of a democracy is to have non-bloody rules to get rid of an unpopular government. The more hoops you have to go through, the less democratic a system is. At the end of Dashiell Hammett's "Glass Key" (the novel, not the movies), Paul Madvig comments that this time, the other side will win the election, and he will lie low for four years until the next vote. And yes, Paul Madvig is a self-serving grifter.
Comment Re:When Trump pulls shit like this (Score 2) 269
Comment Re:Still on the doors? (Score 4, Insightful) 185
Consumers have known for a long time that too much technology in a car is a bad thing.
Apparently not. Otherwise, consumers would not buy all those additional features. Some people calling themselves car guys have claimed for a long time that too much technology in a car is a bad thing. But that's not what consumer demand tells the car companies. And if you look at statistics, car break downs per mile driven are in a constant decline. A 1970ies car at 100,000 miles was ridden down. A 2020ies car at 100,000 miles is just well driven in. Yes, people could fix the 1970ies car themselves. Just buy the manual and the spare part, and off you go. But that was a necessity, not a feature. Today, people want their Apple Carplay and their Android Auto. And that means you need a computer as your head unit. People want cruise control and good mileage, and that means electronic injection. Lambda catalysts have reduced car emissions, and unleaded fuel has severally brought down violent crime numbers 20 years later. This also required electronic injection. People don't want to crank down their windows, and that means electric window controls. People like their stability control, so the car does not go off the road uncontrolled if you make a steering mistake. People like anti lock brakes. Airbags and pretensioners have brought down road fatalities from their heights in the 1970ies.
Yes, you now need to be a learned car specialist to service a car. But you need service far less often, and your car is a better car in all other aspects.