Comment External hard drive (Score 1) 212
Comment Re:Little worried about their science credentials. (Score 1) 191
Comment Re:Good one (Score 1) 1142
Your fallacy is thinking Time is linear. Time is non-linear. It does not exist at the meta-physical level. Time is a *dimension* of mind. After you die will finally grok these concepts, so don't worry about it if you don't "get it" while human - most people don't.
But is Time wibbly-wobbly?
Comment Re:Good one (Score 1) 1142
So why does god get a free pass to come from nothing?
He doesn't. If he exists, it's somewhere outside this universe- somewhere we can't see, since the light from anywhere outside the universe will probably never reach us (something about being inside a giant bubble or whatever). To be honest, I pulled that theory straight out of my ass, so I'm not going to defend it at all.
Comment Re:Counter Measures? (Score 2) 193
Submission + - Algorithm Brings Speedier, Safer CT Scans (intel.com)
Submission + - Gamers outdo computers at DNA sequence alignments (nature.com)
The 'multiple sequence alignment problem' refers to the difficulty of aligning roughly similar sequences of DNA in genes common to many species (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_sequence_alignment). DNA sequences that are conserved across species may play an important role in the ultimate function of that particular gene. But with thousands of genomes likely to be sequenced in the next few years, sequence alignment will only become more difficult in future.
Researchers now report that players of Phylo have produced roughly 350,000 solutions to various multiple sequence alignment problems, beating the accuracy of alignments from a program in roughly 70% of the sequences they manipulated (paper http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031362).