Comment arrgghh (Score 0) 527
This is the most poorly worded story I've read on slashdot in a long time.
This bill does nothing more than reduce restrictions on voluntary contracts between consenting parties.
It boggles my mind that an obviously liberal-biased story summary like this will automatically get hordes and hordes of people to scream about how this will destroy consumer rights or shows that government is in the pocket of big business.
Why will the laws of capitalism, governing the idea that the suppliers that give the best offer (i.e. allow their customers to have sales) will have the best business, cease to function if this law is removed?
This bill does nothing more than reduce restrictions on voluntary contracts between consenting parties.
It boggles my mind that an obviously liberal-biased story summary like this will automatically get hordes and hordes of people to scream about how this will destroy consumer rights or shows that government is in the pocket of big business.
Why will the laws of capitalism, governing the idea that the suppliers that give the best offer (i.e. allow their customers to have sales) will have the best business, cease to function if this law is removed?
