Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Why won't developers use the real documentation? (Score 1) 93

I don't get it why some many developers WON'T use the real documentation. Heck, many of them WON'T even download from official sources, instead relying on third-party collections with obsolete versions, or, worse (at least potentially) intentionally hacked/poisoned mods.

WHY do so many use W3Fools? I once had a Google filter set-up to keep them out of search results. But W3Fools gamed Google with dozens or hundreds of of different domains, until the technique became widespread and Google threw in the towel and removed the filter feature. W3Fools is the WORST possible place to get accurate information. I half-suspect it is actually a Russian or Chinese initiative to spread absolute crap all over the Internet. Find out where W3Fools is blocked. That will tell you who is behind it! ;)

MDN is a GREAT site for learning HTML/CSS/JS. The jQuery Learning Center is a GREAT site for learning jQuery. Why do so many flock to tutorial sites with horrible quality and WRONG information?

I don't use PHP, so don't know if the official documentation is GREAT. I have to guess, though, that after all these years, it can't be totally awful.

(Last time I used PHP was like a year after it first appeared. I think I had it emailed to me by the author. I feel for the author, who is probably blamed by many for it's failings. It was just a simple script to help him with his blog site, and he was an amateur. I do not mean "amateur" in a disparaging way, I mean it in a descriptive, literal sense. Others took it up and built crap on top of a simple script with a simple purpose. Along the way, there's been a corrective course that turned it into a language with a not-completely-awful syntax, but the developers haven't had the will to remove the awful parts. It seems impossible to get PHP developers to stop cutting-and-pasting, and to stop using the awful parts.)

CODE DOES NOT BELONG IN HTML TEMPLATES. CODE DOES NOT BELONG IN HTML TEMPLATES! CODE DOES NOT...

Unfortunately, that's how MOST PHP sites are written.

Comment Re:Kill off GoogleAds infecting/slowing/tracking (Score -1, Offtopic) 88

Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers). Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns! Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM! * Via what u NATIVELY have in the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!

Is that you, Dr. Bronner?

Did you come back as a security consultant?

Comment Re:AIM? (Score 4, Insightful) 106

Maybe nothing. This is probably similar to Google becoming Alphabet......a corporate structure change that has little effect on the consumer facing brands.

But, in this case, it is all about the consumer-facing brand.

  • They would like everybody to forget about Yahoo
  • And, everybody already has forgotten about AOL

Comment Re:Inappropriate Title (Score 1) 200

It's better than that. If x is the increase in the of pedestrians that are being killed because they are inattentive during the smartphone boom, and y is the likelihood of a smartphone-using pedestrian being so consumed that they don't notice a car coming at them, then x(1-y) pedestrians are using smartphones and would have been killed if they hadn't noticed the car. Also, x(1-y)/z, where z is the proportion of walkers staring at their phone at any given time, is the total number of all walkers that are in harm's way. Assuming one-tenth of pedestrians are using smartphones, and one-tenth of the smartphone users bite it (the rest notice the car and move)... then the number of people that successfully run for their life from an inattentive driver that would have killed them is 100 times greater than the increase in fatalities.

Substitute whatever y and z you want and it's obvious the drivers are a much bigger problem than the pedestrians.

Comment Re:Use the Crosswalk! (Score 2) 200

I have an opposing viewpoint... I walk for exercise most days on my lunch hour. I work in an ostensibly "walk friendly" community with a ton of antique shops on main street. I plan my route so I only cross one street that's bigger than a residential side street.

I get nearly killed at least once a month. It's almost always by someone turning left into a parking lot, so they're coming from my rear. The problem here isn't that people are on their phones. The problem is that drivers would mow down pedestrians at an alarming rate if we weren't constantly dodging cars. I once had a lady nearly kill me, then pull into the lot, get out of her car, and berate me for walking on the sidewalk that she needed to drive over.

Another one that bothers me: Car is first at a red light and is turning left. There is no possibility that this car will go anywhere until the light turns green. However, the car slowly creeps forward until they are entirely blocking the crosswalk and ten feet in front of it (on the intersection side). I now have two choices - walk in front of the car, which is nearly in the other road, or walk behind the car. I used to walk behind the car, until one day, a car turned left and almost hit me. I realized that the left turning car couldn't see me because I was completely shielded by the SUV I walked behind. Now I always walk in front of them - or stop and stare at them until they back up.

Comment Re:Complain daily (Score 1) 258

Nope, I'm moving. Seriously. Driving on this road didn't make me decide to sell my house, but it played a role in where the next one will be. They don't need me to tell them it's a bad intersection - the memorial flowers left for the people who died there say more than I ever could.

Besides, I'm too old to fight authoritarian bureaucrats that think tickets are the solution to traffic safety, jail is the solution to drugs, and kicking the troublemakers out of school is the way to fix education.

Another thing... are you suggesting that my lack of reporting this makes my analysis of the issue less valid? Or are you simply trying to gently redirect the conversation from pointing out that your counterpoint isn't very good to a conversation about my poor citizenship?

Comment Re:40.000 deaths (Score 1) 258

If you're referring to intersections that show the left* lane a green disc instead of a green arrow, the proper maneuver is a "LEFT TURN YIELD ON GREEN" as described in the driver's manual. First enter the intersection while the signal is green. Then by the time it turns red, you're already legally in the intersection and have the right and duty to clear it once oncoming traffic to your left ceases.

I am referring to this type of intersection. The maneuver doesn't entirely fix the problem. On my way home from work, I have to turn left off a major street at such an intersection. During the evening rush hour, there is zero chance that there will be a break in the oncoming traffic during the green. The light cycle is about three minutes. So the total volume of traffic that can make this left turn legally is 20 cars per hour. That's not nearly enough.

Comment Re:40.000 deaths (Score 4, Insightful) 258

Nobody died because someone crossed the intersection 0.3 seconds after it turned red. The other light isn't even green yet. Your statement implies a correlation between traffic enforcement and road safety, but this correlation is frighteningly weak. Unfortunately, enforcement is concentrated on things that are easy to measure instead of things that are most dangerous.

Red light cameras are a great example of ineffective enforcement. Red light running generally falls into two categories: people that push the boundary and people that make mistakes (not paying attention, drunk, didn't clean windshield, etc.). Cameras can make people choose not to push the boundary, but they are very bad at correcting the latter behavior. So, they shift a lot of money to the government and the camera operating company, without having much of an effect on safety.

You can tell a government is serious about safety when they start redesigning bad intersections instead of wagging their fingers at people driving 36 in a 35 or going through intersections one second after the light turns red. Research has shown time and time again that if there is a trend of people running the beginning of a particular red light, the best solution is to make the yellow longer. Often blatant red light violations come from intersections with no left turn arrow. Frustrated drivers wait an entire light cycle (or four), and then finally just go when the opposite lane clears as the light turns red. Once again, the correct solution is to change the intersection. Yelling at (or fining) the drivers does nobody any good.

Comment Good news! The grays do not want to eat us! (Score 3, Funny) 313

Have always been surprised at Trump's support of NASA, whether as magnanimously as he would like us think or not. At least it is not a 30% or more cut like some other agencies. He rejects science, except when it comes to expanding real estate...

I guess the good news here is that we can conclude that the Grays - whom I assume are in total control of every President - do NOT want to eat us! They do not seem to care about our health.

Of course, that doesn't mean that they don't want to turn us into some powdered industrial product. But at least they do not want to eat us!

Comment Re:Obviously this requires new legislation (Score 5, Informative) 102

It goes both ways. We are currently using the principle behind this law to shield drone pilots from repercussions. There's also this case where the US says a border guard was within his rights to shoot a man in Mexico.

Given what we have to lose, it's unlikely that the US government will change its position on this issue.

Slashdot Top Deals

Your computer account is overdrawn. Please see Big Brother.

Working...