What did The Supremes ever do to you? If anything they Don't Take It Away.

Unless you're in the professional male sex slave business.

At least in that environment the word doesn't imply a dysfunctional user interface.

Would it really be news if all that was reported was "Criminal Commits Crime"?

For example I think no less of 88-year old men, nor think they're all murdering criminals, just because there was a headline "88-year old killed wife with ax".

Now it may be that a person thinks hacker == criminal, but then a such person would not know a hacker (at least one who was not a criminal), and so their view should not affect one. Seeking respect for a group one may associate with, among strangers you'll never meet and whose views you'll never even hear, seems rather silly.

It is rumored that to prevent pouching, David Bowman has suggested the elephants, when not grazing, could be kept in some sort of "pod bay", as he calls it, which could only be accessed through doors controlled by a computer with advanced AI.

But 50 is only a soft cap. Sure, leveling after that takes more time and effort, but it's no reason to stop playing.

Which choices would those be? Yes or no? Those seem to be the only possible answers to the question unless you go the 'not really' or 'not on wednesdays' -route.

"lower hanging fruit... from sensitive areas of touch... underwear"

We all saw a mile away where you were going there... but seriously, combined with the tongue input device it could possibly make people more willing to "see eye to eye" on things.

As long as they are married, STD deviation should remain minimal.

I know quite a few people who would skip both lunch and web surfing to get a quickie around the corner.

Or just have Sir Humphrey as a Permanent Secretary. He always seems to get the job done. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes_Minister