Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:Standard Ruling Party shit. (Score 1) 304

Me? No. I'm watching you unable to express a single salient point on your own. Here's one you can work from: Hillary Clinton, if she were anyone else, would now at the very least be unable to get a security clearance, and she's been steadily lying to you about the circumstances around her handling, hiding and destruction of government records. This pleases you. You like that she lies to you, because you're smug enough to think that even though you know better, you're hoping that everyone else in the world is too dumb not to fall for it. Your own response, rather than being your own factual rebuttal of that characterization of her actions, will be to say that I haven't sufficiently read other material.

This is because you know she's indefensible, and you know that if you use your own words here to say that she (for example) hasn't been lying about such things, you'll be confirmed as a fool. So, of course you're deflecting and attempting to avoid going on the record. Predictable, typical, nothing new. But still entertaining in its transparency.

Comment Re:Standard Ruling Party shit. (Score 1) 304

Here we go with the trite dismissal of third party votes again.

I'm not dismissing those votes at all. They have a very real effect on the election. Such as helping the Clinton Machine back into executive power.

The only person being dismissive is YOU (in your assertion that those votes impact both of the larger parties in the same way, and thus don't really change anything .. THAT is dismissive).

Comment Re:Standard Ruling Party shit. (Score 1) 304

We'll be stuck with that racist, mysoginist, xenophobe for 4 years.

Ah, I see you're one of the people pretending to actually think that, while also pretending you don't know anything about Hillary Clinton. If you're going to stay that uninformed, please don't do anything dangerous to those around you, like voting.

Comment Re:Deeply offensive, beyond spoiled brat (Score 0) 421

How does the fact that someone else makes more money than you do make you a slave? Be specific. Try to be intellectually coherent, too. Oh, and while you're at it, you make more money than most people in the entire world ... is your willingness to accept that money making other people slaves? No? I see.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 421

Because if you look at who the emails are from, according to TFS, none are from Hillary. The headline is clickbait.

They're not from her, but they're directly or indirectly all ABOUT her and the DNC's unwavering Coronate Hillary position. What else did you think was going to be the focus of the matter? Yoga and wedding plans? Right.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 421

I didn't know that nominating the primary candidate with the most votes of any party in a democratic election was a "coronation"

It has the "coronation" feel to it because it's been a foregone conclusion since before Sanders suddenly woke up one morning and decided he was a Democrat and joined the party so he could push Hillary into a more publicly-visible lefty posture. He had no chance of beating the Clinton machine and the fully assembled corporate, media, and entertainment industry backers that had already picked her, and he knew it.

Comment Re:This confirms my previous speculation (Score 1) 421

There might be sensitive or personal information that he doesn't think should be made public

Since when has that stopped him?

The ONLY consideration on his part is whether he's got his hands on something he can personally leverage to improve his own situation and stick himself back into public focus.

Slashdot Top Deals

The absent ones are always at fault.