Comment Re:I think it's BS (Score 1) 102
How many people can say that?
In Amsterdam, for example? Probably a lot.
How many people can say that?
In Amsterdam, for example? Probably a lot.
if you decide to cut through a lipo cell make sure it's fully charge and record it. also make sure you have proper protective gear and fire extinguishers.
On second thought, just make sure it's fully charged and record it.
Protective gear around the camera. We don't care if he's damaged, but we do want to see the footage.
Not to mention that the AI driving the car can probably "see" in the infrared and in all directions simultaneously so would likely have noticed the elk in the woods running towards the road long before a human driver and wouldn't have to brake hard to barely avoid a collision.
I thought drinking age laws were coerced on the States with the threat of pulling road funding rather than mandated through the Interstate commerce clause.
IAAF Competition Rules, Rule 143
Shoes
2. Athletes may compete barefoot or with footwear on one or both feet.
The purpose of shoes for competition is to give protection and
stability to the feet and a firm grip on the ground. Such shoes,
however, must not be constructed so as to give an athlete any unfair
additional assistance, including by the incorporation of any
technology which will give the wearer any unfair advantage. A shoe
strap over the instep is permitted. All types of competition shoes must
be approved by IAAF.
Doesn't the U.S. Federal Government have Sovereign Immunity?
but they can still cause a buttload of trouble in the U.N. if the U.K. does it.
No they can't. The UK has a veto at the UN. If the UK abstains because they are directly involved in the incident, the US also has a veto.
If a state chooses to recognize a contract between two opposite sex, two same sex, or 3 same or mixed sex partners its the sates business, not the federal government.
Does the Federal government give tax benefits to married people? If so, they need a definition of "married". That definition could be "as legally defined in your state" but I don't know enough about the US Constitution to know if it would be legal to have the Federal government tax people differently based on which state they live in.
Why do you have to answer the questions with the correct answers? As long as you remember how you answered them, it doesn't matter if the answers are actually correct. Your first pet could be George W. Bush. Your elementary school could be Starfleet Academy.
If everyone in that theater was armed and had at least rudimentary firearms safety training... how far do you think the crazy guy would have gotten?
Obviously, nobody can answer a hypothetical question. However, let me ask one in return. How many people would have died in the crossfire if everyone in that theater was armed, only had rudimentary firearms safety training, and all started firing trying to take the crazy guy down? It was dark and smoky. The movie special effects were ongoing. If everyone pulled weapons and started shooting, I'm sure that at least one would be hero would have been misidentified as an accomplice by another would be hero.
So what next?
Two factor authentication.
That may be, but DOS was 16-bit, as was Windows 3.0 and 3.1. Until OS/2 2.0 and Windows 95, there was no particular need for a 386 - a 286 would have worked just fine.
A 386 provided Virtual 86 mode which was needed to multitask DOS applications.
The US Congress declared war on Iraq, not Bush. The President of the United States does not have the power nor the authority to declare a war, which is why Obama broke the law when he had our military bomb Libya without cause, provocation or a declaration of war.
Congress hasn't declared war on anyone since World War II. Congress did authorize the use of military force in Iraq in 2002 based on what Bush thought to be appropriate.
In reality, it's traveling at exactly the speed of light.
Don't neutrinos have mass? Can particles with mass be accelerated to light speed? Without reading the article or the paper and not having taken even a college physics class, I would have expected that a neutrino should have been traveling at near light speed rather than "exactly the speed of light".
"We'll have a fair trial and then hang the guilty bastard."
Can anyone remember when the times were not hard, and money not scarce?