If you'll read the actual paper, it says that skilled ones see when LLM hallucinating but benefit when it's not and not so skilled waste time on testing false positive results. What a surprise! Who would have thought!
I don't see any controversy here, LLM writes code or texts exactly in the same way. It's a tool, you can use it, it may help, it may not. Like any other tool.
With all this IoT FUD: what is actual benefit for me? Washing machine is good at washing, adding remote controlled fancy app does not add a thing to it's value for. IMHO this is all about trying to sell more crap to the investors "LOOK IN 2030 EVERYONE WOULD HAVE BT-ENABLED TOOTHBRUSH". No, we would not. I have serious doubt that it would even work in car industry as it is expected in these articles. BMW's approach to sell you subscripting-based heating seat feature for the hardware you own already is uncool and didn't worked well at a first attempt.
And is the reward he offers for pushing to the limits adequate? Or as it's usually goes? Seems like he don't feel the difference between working on own company and be the hired employee.