Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Unencrypted? (Score 1) 128

Well, the company that signs an NDA has a duty to protect something once it's in their possession. If it was on an encrypted drive and someone was to do something that fucking dumb, they would certainly have made a case for negligence against themselves.

The producers of this film may as well have put it on some shitbox web server and emailed a link for all the security they chose.

It's just not that hard.

Comment Re:hazing? (Score 1) 180

Straw man. Let me help you:

1. try to stay on topic instead of flailing about like a fucking idiot.
2. before you knock down something I never said, first show that I said it.
3. I'm glad you're so upset by something I've posted in the past that you feel the need to still be butthurt about it. I love knowing I've influenced you, and have a free spacious room inside your head any time I need it.

Comment Re:Lost a stolen drive? (Score 1) 128

1. producer was an idiot and sent them a copy of their unreleased product on an unencrypted drive.
2. someone boosted the drive from Netflix's offices, along with many other drives
3. producer gets mad that Netflix lost it, while taking no accountability themselves for spending an extra $100 for a hardware encrypted drive that requires a password or combination to decrypt and mount

Seriously, this is negligence on the part of the dumbass producer that did not bother with reasonable protections for their own work product, and now they are trying to blame Netflix.

Fuck this guy.

Comment Re:Unencrypted? (Score 1) 128

Exactly.

If you think you have something worth $45M on a fucking USB drive, how about making sure that USB drive is worthless if it ends up in the wrong hands?

These morons caused their own problem by not protecting themselves with ubiquitously available means that are not novel in any way. There are hardware encrypted devices out there specifically for this kind of thing. Like, you know, this thing.

This lawsuit should be thrown out for negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

Comment Re:The oppposite tack (Score 1) 180

That would be perfectly fine.

It's not a public flogging, instead it's someone agreeing (i.e. consent) and it's not bad performance based where there are rules about how to deal with underperformance, and pies to the face isn't part of that rule set.

Literally nobody would have a problem with what you suggest.

Comment Re:hazing? (Score 1) 180

I'm so tired of your constant justification and equivocation that just doesn't pass the basic sniff test of reality.

What if the employee had past trauma about being tied up? Don't you think this might trigger that? Instant lawsuit.

What if the employee has a dairy allergy, and smashing whipped cream up their nose triggers anaphylaxis? Instant lawsuit.

What if the employee suffers lacerations in their eyes from sharp pie crust fragments? Instant lawsuit.

What if the regional manager learns of this? Store manager instantly fired, and who knows what HR would require to legally cover the corporation.

This.
Is.
In.
Every.
Fucking.
Way.
Shamelessly.
Idiotic.

And so are you for your rationalization of it. Grow the fuck up.

Slashdot Top Deals

Uncertain fortune is thoroughly mastered by the equity of the calculation. - Blaise Pascal

Working...