Comment SeattleGuy (Score 2, Interesting) 393
I think there is a flaw in the argument by SafeNet/MediaSentry that the information is: "available to millions of users. If private investigator licenses were required to do what MediaSentry does, every user on Limewire and other illegal p2p networks would be required to have a license. Indeed, every search engine and Internet user would be required to have a private investigator license if MediaSentry needs one." is flawed.
Millions of users might have access to all of that information, but only one is making money from it..... Guess who???!? SafeNet/MediaSentry. Their business is based upon the SALE of that information to the RIAA.
That must count for something in this smoke and mirrors game they are playing, don't ya' think?
Millions of users might have access to all of that information, but only one is making money from it..... Guess who???!? SafeNet/MediaSentry. Their business is based upon the SALE of that information to the RIAA.
That must count for something in this smoke and mirrors game they are playing, don't ya' think?
