The pervasive call for higher protein intake stems from the assertion that people are not getting adequate amounts in their diet, namely the 0.8 g/kg/day recommended by the National Academy of Medicine and the World Health Organization.
and your quote, where the relevant part is
1.6 g/kg/day, twice the recommended dietary allowance
Last time I checked, 0.6 is half of 1.2, not of 1.6, that would be
Try to read the summary again... slowly and it helps to move your lips.
The summary states 0.6 g/kg, not 1.6 g/kg
Maybe take your own advice? from TFS
found no evidence supporting intake beyond 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight
In fact, 0.6g/kg is nowhere in the summary, the recommended amount is 0.8g/kg.
Math is hard.
Especially true when merely reading TFS is hard.
No, you're saying that if some crooks can take advantage of corrupted/captured jurisdictions to get away with murder and some others escape because the prosecution cannot obtain enough evidence for a conviction[*], then the ones that do get convicted due to enough evidence and a proper use of the justice system should subsequently be set free anyway because reasons. Then, no doubt, such a decision should be the basis for letting the next convictions be vacated, because now at least one full-fledged conviction was not enforced fully or at all. Good reasoning all around.
[*] to get an idea about how hard it is to prosecute financial crimes when the will to do it exists, look at how much potential evidence had to be thrown out due to technicalities in Holmes' trial. Getting absolutely ALL the ducks in a row when the opposing council hunts for any slight mistake is not trivial.
Well, for some very VERY small subset of "it." And if you start disabling the broken ancillary services that it grew like some mutant monster - right now, it's best to get rid of stuff like the broken "internal" dhcp client, the ntp service, the resolver service
Besides, it seems dear old Greg is getting forgetful in his advanced years. One might want to take a trip down the memory line to the point that the systemd devs kinda sorta angered the kernel devs by requesting that there should be a change in the kernel parameters passed by the bootloader, as systemd wanted to take over some of those because
But I would never use Javascript anyway for a backend, that is IMHO where Java excels and there is basically never a reason not to use Java.
Valuing one's mental health, perhaps? or having a high opportunity cost for the time spent digging through the insane number of pages of exceptions that the application server outputs for anything that goes wrong?
It serves two purposes, one is that it's a combination of practical maths, combined with breaking down problems into very small steps, combined with problem solving, abstract thinking, logic and so on. No other topic does that at school.
It seems any Math classes you ever attended were something of a joke. What makes you think CS will be any different? (as a hint, one is far more likely to learn those skills you enumerated in a properly taught Math class; without that as a basis there's little chance a CS class will compensate)
Besides being off-topic and coming across as rather insecure, you are aware that anyone who shorted TSLA in the last week of August is still in the money, right? as currently the stock is ~20% down from September 1st
I wont need SS for another 30 years. I am all for gutting SS and using the cash for free college.
Aaaaand there you have it, ladies and gents. Apres moi the deluge, Millennial version. Not so different from the Boomer version in essence, only in details.
Humans inherently don't have a good perception of the consequences cascade of their actions. There is always something done in good faith that'll eventually have some bad consequences down the road. Mistakes are easy. Scapegoating is easier.
For kicks, someone should come up with a boomer hoodie with something like
OK kid, let's talk about shitty day wishes in about 50 years.
That should be enough time for a little wisdom.
With batteries, you get energy density or power density, but not both; high power density cells are not only more expensive, but less energy dense.
Nonsense alert - while energy density is a well-defined, meaningful metric, power density is at best a poorly defined one and at worst a meaningless juxtaposition of words, a.k.a. marketing. It certainly does not make sense to talk about both of them together this way. One of them is a physical metric, the other is
And you can up the power density just by adding more cells.
Sorry Rei, but this shows your bullshit detector is out of whack. If it's [something] density then the total amount of volume (or in this case, cells) is irrelevant, since density is [something] per unit volume (or per cell). So the statement is wrong as is, would be "right-er" for power, but then it's not just cells that you have to add, is it? more power requires higher amperage wiring, better cooling, and so on - it's not just about stuffing the car to the gills with batteries.
And lastly, for the record: despite how this Slashdot summary makes it sound, despite the short-selling surge, Tesla's stock has already recovered 2/3rds of the drop after the call. And I can't think of anything dumber than shorting a stock because you thought the CEO was rude during a call (despite the company beating its whisper number, the number that the stock was valued based on, immediately beforehand). I mean, seriously, you're going to drop the stock nearly 10% because you thought the CEO was rude? Get over your personal obsession with the guy.
:-( this post started so well, factual and stuff. Please, next time, try to refrain from repeating something like this last paragraph. If you really have to, make a separate post. There are so many things wrong in this small ending that it'd take a full post to explain - stuff about how stock market works, about sending messages, especially during conference calls, and lastly about irony and seeing emotions in others while being blind to them in oneself. I am aware of your history of posting pro-Musk things on
A key point here is it was wildly inappropriate for Comey to recommend no prosecution in this case on TV. It is totally not his decision. The prosecutors in the DOJ are the ones who get to decide if prosecution is warranted. The FBI's job was to investigate and generate a report to the DOJ. They do get to make a recommendation regarding prosecution but it is only a recommendation. Comey absolutely should not have announced the recommendation at a press conference before the DOJ has even started reviewing the final FBI report. It reeks of prejudicing the entire case since it places inappropriate pressure on the prosecutor in the DOJ to not prosecute when they may well be inclined to prosecute when they see all the evidence.
Comey s assertion that Clinton and her people had no intent to do harm by mishandling top secret compartmentalized information so they should not be prosecuted is also way over the line. The fact is they did mishandle top secret information, and it is unknowable if that mishandling resulted in the information being accessed by foreign powers or others who were not authorized to see it. You knowingly mishandle classified information in violation of the oath you signed there have to be consequences otherwise why should anyone bother to protect classified information. If Clinton is elected President how can she expect the millions of Federal employees working for her to protect classified information when she knowingly didn't and got away with it.
Thirdly mishandling email is only part of the case against the Clinton. A key reason Clinton may have been using this private server is there may have been email between her, foreign governments and affluent individuals who were donating large sums of money to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State creating the appearance that she was soliciting bribes in return for favorable decisions from the State department on things like arms deals. Clinton is claiming these are personal emails so she withheld them from the FBI but they may be a trail pointing to public corruption.
It smacks of whitewash to suddenly short circuit these investigations so Clinton will have a clean path to the nomination at the convention which is just a few days away now.
I wish I'd known about these servers. I would play WoW again if it was the 2006 vintage instead of the crap its become. To answer your criticism, if Blizzard wants to keep WoW going forever, roll back to 2006 vintage, and focus entirely on new and interest dungeons and gear. Also put the level cap back to 60 and keep it there. New and interesting PVE dungeons was the only thing that made WoW great. Making the game "easy" for casual players was another tragic mistake.
2006 vintage WoW would be right before Burning Crusade came out and BC would be just about the time WoW started to suck and I quit playing. In 2006 there were 64 player raids, no constantly shifting level caps that constantly trashed all your gear, you lived to get to get to level 60 and collect PVE gear.
Every good guild on the server I was on, including my own, blew apart about that time, people wandered off to PvP to get the gear Blizz was handing out like candy to distract from the fact all their hard won level 60 PVE gear was being trashed and running Molten Core and BWL was officially pointless. It had become a waste of time doing PVE raids entirely which was the whole point of WoW.
In those days you only ran dungeons with people on your server, yea it sucked waiting to get groups sometimes but you actually made friends and learned to trust or not trust the people you played with on your server. When they started jumbling together pick up runs from all servers you didn't know and couldn't trust ANYONE you were raiding with. Dungeons just became a whirlwind you ran through as quickly as possible and half the time someone in the group would be a total ass and get away with it.
Of course it might be an intentional backdoor to allow NSA, DHS, FBI, law enforcement to track persons of interest so you can be SURE facebook would be upset that it was made public as would the three letter Federal agencies using it.
The cooler thing would be if you have enough high speed printing capacity that you could manufacture and assemble a 1000 drone swarm in a very short period of time and overwhelm an adversaries defenses without requiring a ship big enough to carry a 1000 completed drones. And then another one, and another one. You would need a tanker full of plastic and a freighter full of batteries, electronics and propellers.
âoeKill decisionâ baby.
I would mostly agree with parent. Soylent is fine execpt the community isnt big enough so the comments are barely there or worth reading, the name is kind of bad and the stories are routinely just old enough to be yesterdays news on Slashdot or Hacker news.
Their Twitter feed, which is where I get my news feeds, also puts these really annoying lame "from the deptâ attempts at humor in the tweets instead of just the title of the story and the link:
Razer Acquires Ouya Software Assets, Ditches Hardware from the kicked-down dept
They will even thorten the title to make room for the utterly stupid âoefrom theâ.
The best solution to replace Slashdot would probably be if Hacker news grafted the classic Slashdot look, commenting and moderation system on to their generally good stories and great community.
"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch