Or more specifically, "Last Man Standing, but with 100 people." Your game isn't even original to begin with here.

I hate it when organizations and entities I like do incredibly shitty things. Have fun hanging out with Lars Ulrich, I guess.

Pretty sure switching to Mac already accomplished this for them.

https://www.cio.com/article/31...

Maybe there's a dongle for that?

Hammurabi a hack? What are you talking about? This shit seems SUPER fair:

"If any one steal cattle or sheep, or an ass, or a pig or a goat, if it belong to a god or to the court, the thief shall pay thirtyfold therefor; if they belonged to a freed man of the king he shall pay tenfold; if the thief has nothing with which to pay he shall be put to death."

"If a son strikes his father, they shall cut off his fingers."

"If any one brings an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital offense charged, be put to death."

"If conspirators meet in the house of a tavern-keeper, and these conspirators are not captured and delivered to the court, the tavern-keeper shall be put to death."

I do remember it. I also remembered their "you're holding it wrong" solution":

https://www.scart.be/sites/def...

Very brave.

...every bit counts.

Save a bit. One Space only.

There is an insane amount of difference between stone and concrete, for what it's worth.

Like cleaning up a pile of Lego bricks on the floor, the big ones clean up fast, it's all the little, hard to see ones that take the most time.

I'd say "consider the source," but then I considered the people I'm dealing with.

That would be correctly used, if your source didn't make your argument subject to another logical fallacy.

How about you agree to never quote Breitbart or Infowars, and the rest of us will never quote Daily Kos or Alternet? Deal?

People with this attitude remind me of the holdouts who prefer individual browser windows to a tabbed interface. There are a few out there, but the rest of us have moved on to a more efficient form of use.

I, too, used to prefer having a folder structure with the various types of files layered throughout it. I still do create these structures and separate some things I like to stand alone. For everything else that has heavily related and connected content, OneNote is invaluable.

I use OneNote regularly, both at work and home, and heavily for organizing D&D/RPG campaigns. There are too many features (the tagging, is incredibly important) missing from Windows 10 OneNote for me to make the switch. Once there's enough parity, I could probably migrate, but it's seriously impaired without the features that make it most useful.

The fake news brigade is out of control. The Washington Post is a news outlet, and in this case and others, reports on facts.

I'm sorry if they're not the facts you like, but they are, in fact, FACTS.

When I go to watch a movie or start a new series, I usually check to see if it's already showing on any of the various services I'm already paying for. Why go searching for a movie if I can just fire up Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video or Crunchyroll? Sites that track what's currently playing on the major services are useful, since you can quickly "search" all of your services at once. It kind of reminds me of the old "Dogpile" search engine (which I literally just found out is still somehow a thing) that searched the other search engines for you, back when there was no parity in the sites they returned.

I agree with the above sentiment that the service wasn't incredibly useful a lot of the time, since it did tend to point to a bunch of random services that I'd never heard of, and therefore didn't really trust. Still, a site that can keep track of the content offered on your streaming services IS still useful, in my opinion.

All horseshit. You completely misunderstand and misrepresent the results Johnathan Haidt's studies.

I did not. More evidence you didn't RTFA.

And then your counter-response is to roll out the same, tired bullshit stereotypes every other asswipe on the right does. Is this the part where I call you Hitler, racist, or too stupid to understand modern science? Are you a flat-earther, member of the KKK, or a lobbyist for "big oil?"

There's a high probability you're somewhere in the middle, like the majority of Americans. Left-leaning or right, you just want what's best for you and yours. You want the freedom to make your own choices about your life, and you want to be able to protect yourself from threats, both foreign and domestic. You probably don't care much about where we land on abortion, marijuana, or even gun laws, as long as you're free to make your own decisions about each, as a non-criminal, law-abiding citizen.

Instead, when you dive into the same rhetoric where everyone left of your viewpoint is treated as if they were Antifa, PETA, or a "Social Justice Warrior," you're just as guilty as the same assholes who would call you an Alt-Right, racist Nazi.

Keep up the good work, Svetlana.