another alternative (Score 1)

The problem is that camera manufacturers charge a recurrent fee per month per camera ($6,000!!!) to cities. Cities need to do revenue from that. There are other methods less invasive and less expensive. I saw this one called the mole and is a cool concept. I know that some cities are using it to help reduce red light running and reduce recidivism. Their site has even links to other cites were explain why cameras don't work well and can be easily deceit. www.auspextechnologies.com