Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:AI break down (Score 1) 133

The problem is companies selling AI as replacing humans entirely has been a farce with todays level of technology.
Not sure what is that supposed to mean. No one is "selling AI as" ...
Fact is there are companies that have instead of 90 employees only 5. All others are AI agents.
That did not happen by replacing 85 employees with AI, but that is how the company got founded.

And how did your training help any company with cost savings, productivity, etc so that companies can just use your AI to replace humans?
How should I know that?
Oh, I can't.

They did not tell me in what miserabler state they were before I trained their AIs, nor in what glorious state they were afterwards.

Are you actually to stupid to go on Linkedin or what ever job seeking/seeker/hiring site you like to hang out: and simply browse interesting job offers?

Without AI knowledge: you go no where in our times. Perhaps you can become a brick layer?

The problem is companies selling AI as replacing humans entirely has been a farce with todays level of technology.
It is not about replacing humans. It is about doing things: you can not do without AI ... with todays technology.

Comment Re:AI break down (Score 1) 133

Its an established way of marketing, customer testimony, proof
The company exists, because their customers do not want to be disclosed.

A company - aka a customer of Scale.ai - could simply build up their own AI, but they do not want to be known doing that.

No idea why you are so stupid?

Even *I* do not know for which end customers I worked.

No idea what you want to discuss anyway. If you were actually interested in AI you would do your own research.

To assume, makes an ass out of you an me.
Why? Does it disturb you that I worked for a company - but never looked at their webs site? What is disturbing about that? I am absolutely not interested "how they sell themselves" - for what purpose would I need to spent time there? To discuss with you how bad/good their site is? Well: I do not care how bad or good their site is.

Comment Re:Using technology is hard (Score 1) 100

Similar - by a far sketch - happend to me.
We were rock climbing, and rested to long on the peak enjoying the sunset.
Half an hour after we were down, we had to walk something like 30 mins or more to our car.
Through the forest, mostly firn trees, but plenty of wide canapé deciduous trees.
It was so damn dark, you literally could see nothing. Absolutely nothing.
You could "imagine" that you see your hands if you hold them in front of your eyes.
We basically only found the way out as the main "trail" was a NATO forest trail used by Pershing carrying trucks, so you could feel the way the trail goes. I mean, it was made from compressed rubble and clay, and had an convex surface, so you easy realized if you are somewhere in the center or at the edges, and the whole path went downhill out of the forest.

Took us ages to get out of the forest.

Comment Re:Dumb (Score 1) 100

I am all for rescuing them, but they should be billed for it afterwards. That is an idiotic (American) standpoint.
a) they would be broke for the rest of their life - and could not even pay a fraction
b) they would not call for help - but try to do some risky things and die
c) if they had to pay an entrance fee to the park - the fee covers the "rescue insurance"
c1) if there was no entrance fee: the health insurance pays - at least in a normal country
c2) rescue operations for people in danger: are free in "normal countries", there are edge cases like a sailing boat with broken engine in front of a harbour, asking for a tow - but if there is an real emergency every means of rescuing which is in range is mobilized: no matter of costs - at least in a civilized country.

Actually one would assume that I have paid enough taxes already, and my military service: should be at my service when I need it. For an IT/CS professor: you are exceptional stupid in my eyes.

Comment Re:Dumb (Score 1) 100

Has nothing to do with AI.
And if one would ask AI, they most likely would get pretty solid hints what to do and what not.

The problem is that younger generations never did any serious outdoor activities as kids. Have in general an odd world view about "common sense".

I once had a GF in Paris, actually a clever girl - but nearly no knowledge about "physics". We left a subway station and I walked to the direction we want to go, and she askes: "you have been here before?" I said "no, why?"
"How do you know where to go?"
"Well, the restaurant is west from the exit - that way is west ..."
"How can you know that this way is west????"
"Erm, the sun is there" - pointing at the sun - "it is 13:00, so west is there ... and the restaurant is in 100m on the other side of the road"
"What has the sun to do with that?"

Turns out: at age of 40, she did not know then that sun rises in the east, and sets in the west, and is around noon in the south (on our hemisphere).

When I told her that: she did not believe it.

Anyway, if I would be hiking, I had paper maps. Minimum 2 of different scales. And a rough hand written note from where to where to go. Phone off. So It is charged if I really need it. A compass is helpful, but worst case the phone has one. The most important thing is having enough water, or means to get fresh (clean) water. Some energy bars perhaps. Something - a cloak or jacket - that is somewhat water tight. Minimum one set of replacement cloth. First aid kit, including sewing material - even if you never stitched an open wound. A whistle. If you get into distress, you blow the whistle every 30 minutes. Depending what you can carry and where you go: a rope. A walking stick, like in a Kung Fu movie: it can not be overrated how important and useful a stick is.
Dozens of more things to think about.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...