Comment Netbeans and JBuilder (Score 1) 679
I've used the Netbeans.
It's written in Java and very slow. It uses memory too much.
And the UI is not well organized.
Jbuilder is faster then Netbeans and runs well on my Pentium 333Mhz machine.
It doesn't look like written in C/C++, though.
I like its options for setting { } style, event adapter style, etc.
I think the JBuilder is good and easy to use.
Features I want?
Java Applet Debugger
Faster speed
I think development env. should not be written in Java. Because it's too slow. It means that if you do something wrong or right, and want to check the result, you can't figure it out quickly.
Sometimes, the change is not reflected although you do right. Then the slow respone of the IDE can give you confusion.
It's written in Java and very slow. It uses memory too much.
And the UI is not well organized.
Jbuilder is faster then Netbeans and runs well on my Pentium 333Mhz machine.
It doesn't look like written in C/C++, though.
I like its options for setting { } style, event adapter style, etc.
I think the JBuilder is good and easy to use.
Features I want?
Java Applet Debugger
Faster speed
I think development env. should not be written in Java. Because it's too slow. It means that if you do something wrong or right, and want to check the result, you can't figure it out quickly.
Sometimes, the change is not reflected although you do right. Then the slow respone of the IDE can give you confusion.
