Comment Europeans were bred to consume fermented alcohol (Score 1) 184
Many European civilizations were bred to consume fermented alcohol.
In Europe (and other parts of the globe), as humans came to populate the earth, they by nature fouled the their surface waters. We urinated and pooped and then proceeded to flush it into the nearest waterway. People living in towns had no access to springs, or clean wells or other and relied on local waterway as a source of water. The solution to potable water back then was not to make latrines or to boil the water. As we entered the middle ages it was realized that adding a bit of fermented alcohol to water kept people from getting sick. Fermenting alcohol wasn't very difficult to make. Understanding that it could make water potable, made it a civil prize next to the wheel. Eureka.
Everyone was on board. The churches of Europe drew their congregations together and cemented their power by providing fermented alcohol to the local populace. Every church fermented alcohol. If you were not a member of the church, you didn't have easy access to potable water.
Mother nature at work:
As we added fermented alcohol to make our water potable, (using beer, wine or mead) we feed it to our freshly weaned children. If the child was allergic to ethanol, it couldn't articulate the problem and not adding ethanol was a death sentence. Either way, peoples of European (and other) decent, unknowingly removed these people from the gene pool. One of the reasons infant mortality was high. In Europe everyone who was adverse to ethanol was gone.
There is a second subtractive effect here too. At this juncture in our heritage, fermented alcohol was easily accessible and easy to abuse. During the early middle ages, transgressions by people incapable of civility while consuming fermented alcohol, would generally lead to a depressed social standing either through excommunication, imprisonment or death. These people didn't get to procreate. They were removed from the gene pool too.
There is a third more additive artifact as pointed out in the article. Anyone who could hold their beer and function well in society, would be rewarded with a higher status and the means to extend their family. This would be a plus for the peoples with ability to consume fermented alcohol.
I make the point that it is fermented alcohol, not ethanol, that has bred changes in European (and other civilization) This whole process took a millenium or two to effect. Distilled alcohol has only been around for a few hundred years. The inability to consume more that a 10-15% solution of ethanol has lead to a whole new litany of grievances of poor behavior by citizens of this planet, complicating the issue. Stick to fermented beverages.
I came to this realization by first visiting the Octoberfest in Munich. Here you see a quarter million inebriated individuals in a small fairground. At the fest, there a broad mood of good will and camaraderie. No civil unrest. Just a immense group of people having a good time, while consuming fermented alcohol.
On the flip side, I have also seen the nicest native Americans, and pacific islanders when sober, who turn into violent and dangerous individual upon consuming any amount of ethanol. They lack the inadvertent breeding mother nature provided in Europe.
It is only an hypothesis. My wife tells me it is just a twisted rationalization of my drinking.
So there it is. Cheers.
Ropati's hypthesis.