Here is where I pull my hair out discussing the differences between Windows and MAC... Windows 7 (Microsoft) didn't produce the hardware you are running, only the OS. The most likely cause of a poor signal is hardware related which is not 'Windows 7s' fault. At the very least it is a driver issue which again is the fault of the hardware manufacturer, not 'Windows 7'. You can't compare the two this way and it is explanations like this that confuse and misguide people.

I will also add that Using a Linksys router with 4 year old firmware in a basement (game room) on the other end of the house, my iPhone, iPod touch, Droid Eris, 'Windows XP' laptop and iPad all work without issue.

This is certainly not off topic. Crude, perhaps but AC gets the point across.

That is a good question. Why should one assume that the wife wasn't the one viewing the footage or more over that the children weren't viewing pornography of other children the same age as them?

I wondered this as well, I am assuming that there was some previous action from Karttunen. This event seems a bit escalated so he had to have done something in the past.

It's too easy to have someone's life ruined. Even being cleared of charges this person will still have a stigma attached to them. Poor family. To be ripped away like that from your family, your home because some psycho wanted a go at your wife. Investigation wise, they didn't find the hard drive with the man or trace any wrong goings online directly back to him, yet they still charged him with the crime. This seems out of whack to me. Grey area to be sure but to just take the anonymous at their word seems scary.

I think that USED to be the point of the demo, then somewhere along the line demos were converted to beta versions.

It really was a surprisingly fun game to play. Nice graphics, smooth play. and the glave!

I recently installed circulation software for a local library and discovered along the way that in order to use the printer we already had, we needed to purchase yet another license. This boiled me to no end and it wasn't exactly cheap plus based on a subscription fee which means they will need to renew this license to 'use' a printer.

I don't think this is supposed to be 'great' for consumers. FTFA: “I think the music industry has got a great opportunity to open up completely new revenue streams”

To be fair, Resident Evil 'game' was out in 1996. It is not as if it is a bandwagon effort. The first RE movie came out around the time the 6th or 7th game was released. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resident_Evil_(video_game)

http://www.geocities.com/wfdhayride/ I just got signed on to redo this site but I am thinking I will stay nostalgic.

I knew upgrading to my voodoo3 16-bit card would pay off!

Unfortunately this has nothing to do with New York Times' security and that is the whole problem. New York Times hires an 'ad agency' which is quite a bullshit term in this case if you ask me. They embed some open ended script from said firm and then at that point have no idea what is being displayed. This 'firm' may even rent or sell the embedded space to yet another company so then even the firm has no idea what ad is being displayed. All these automated, unmonitored and unregulated ads on pages are a huge security hole but in the name of profit, who really cares?

"If you want to make a little money, write a book. If you want to make a lot of money, create a religion." ~ L. Ron Hubbard