there are scores of films that have achieved sales above $150M on a budget between 20 and 30M, so there's nothing special in that department either.
"Others have also succeeded; this means the very successful thing I don't like is bad." is the dumbest thing I've read so far today. (And yes that is exactly what you MEANT even if it isn't exactly what you wrote. Shut up.)
ID10T's that can't be trusted with gun, badge or any responsibilty.
Cops, you mean.
Trashing the cops again and siding with the criminals and terrorists again, aren't you?
The cops ARE criminals and terrorists.
"The disclaimer also noted that all generated content was verified by an officer and that generative AI was not used to make or recommend a decision."
Get this: they are very obviously lying.
Is Trump and his administration the most deceitful in the last 50 years?
No; they have at all times been perfectly open about wanting to do what they're doing.
So why aren't people who are getting into the computer programming industry learning COBOL?
I know a lot of people who are "in the computer programming industry" and the thing is... they're all kinda really stupid. And for proof of their stupidity you can just look at computer programs: they're about 100% dogshit in the stupidest possible ways.
Create easier tools, get more people produce content.
Why?
Read the article. It assumes
* The article implies it's possible to distinguish between AI art and art made without AI. In other words, if someone at ComicCon were to present AI art as non-AI art, it would be possible to distinguish between the two. I don't know if this is true. If it isn't, then this policy of banning AI art may only result in people saying that the art isn't AI generated, when it is.
This is fine though, since if your art looks like it MIGHT POSSIBLY be "AI"-generated, it's dogshit.
"More software projects have gone awry for lack of calendar time than for all other causes combined." -- Fred Brooks, Jr., _The Mythical Man Month_
