Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Buzzword much? Perhaps post should be deleted? (Score 1) 60

"With designing for the open-source Intel Vulkan Linux driver developed by LunarG, Valve developers were quickly able to resolve issues and progress the driver in a turn-key manner." . . Leaving aside the broken English "With designing for" vs "Using"... "progress the driver in a turnkey manner" sounds (quite lilterally) like a buzzword generator. . . Looks more like an April-1 post to me.

Comment Re:First dissent (Score 1) 2416

You'll be subsidized if you can't afford it. Otherwise, it's pretty much like car insurance, so was the game already over decades ago?

False. Prior car insurance (related) legislation allowed for carrying a bond instead, which could be obtained (or self funded) in any number of ways You were not required to have insurance (or even someone else's bond) so long as you could provide proof that you had the means to pay the minimum coverage. This did NOT require purchasing car insurance.

The "Affordable" Health Care Act has no such provisions.

If you liked Public Housing, the Public Post, and Public Schools, you're going to LOVE Public Health Care.

Comment OpenBSD, virtualization, etc. (Score 1) 181

or maybe the reason is that OpenBSD does not include any virtualisation, rather than it being robust?

Virtualization is irrelevant in this case. Just as Linux fixed this bug in 2006 (CVE-2006-0744) OpenBSD had added a check 2 years earlier, in 2004. Indeed, this is a great example of the "silly security facists slowing down the kernel with unnecessary sanity checks" paying off in spades. (This message was written on Ubuntu 12.0.4 on an AMD64, but will pass through an OpenBSD x86 firewall before getting to /.)

Comment Re:"Passenger advocates" (Score 5, Insightful) 572

The problem: A hugely expensive and virtually value-free arm of the government is causing trouble.

The solution: Grow the government by forming a new department to look after the old one.

Somehow "Fire the bastards and shut down the TSA" doesn't seem to occur to people in congress. (D- or R- types)


Submission + - Disempowering the singular sysadmin 3

An anonymous reader writes: Practically every computer system appears to be at the mercy of at least one individual who holds root or whatever other superuser identity can destroy (or subvert, etc.) that system. Each application on a system has the same weakness. However, making a system require multiple individuals for any root operation (think of the classic two-keys to launch a nuke) has shortcomings: simple operations sometimes require root, and would be enormously cumbersome if they needed a consensus of administrators to execute. There is the idea of a Distributed Administration Network, which is like a cluster of independently-administered servers, but this is a limited case for deployment of certain applications... and anyway it is still presumably vaporware. Are there more sweeping yet practical solutions out there for avoiding the weakness of a singular empowered superuser?

Comment Mathematics for Programmers (Score 1) 609

Like the above poster says: math comes in flavors. Choose the right ones I've worked at small niche-tech companies, and big companies including Google and Amazon. In my experience, calculus and statistics are of *minor* use, but discrete mathematics, combinatorics, graph theory, big-O, etc are *ESSENTIAL* to being a top-tier contributor as a programmer. My degree required 3 semesters of calculus and 2 of statistics. They have been of almost no value at all on a month-to-month basis. I took 3 semesters of "elective" math in other areas (discrete/linear-A/combinatorics) which have helped me on a DAILY or HOURLY basis as a programmer. I'm confident that most of my peers would agree.

Debian Elevates KFreeBSD Port to First-Class Status 376

Reader points out this press release from Debian which says that the port of the Debian system to the FreeBSD kernel will be given equal footing alongside Debian's several other release ports, starting with the release of Squeeze. Excerpting from this release: "The kFreeBSD architectures for the AMD64/Intel EM64T and i386 processor architectures are now release architectures. Severe bugs on these architectures will be considered release critical the same way as bugs on other architectures like armel or i386 are. If a particular package does not build or work properly on such an architecture this problem is considered release-critical. Debian's main motivation for the inclusion of the FreeBSD kernel into the official release process is the opportunity to offer to its users a broader choice of kernels and also include a kernel that provides features such as jails, the OpenBSD Packet Filter and support for NDIS drivers in the mainline kernel with full support."

Comment Hmmmm (Score 2, Funny) 1646

OK, I was all set to say 'Gandalf', but then saw another possibility. But let's run em down: Merlin: He's a pantywaste. No, really. The only reason he made the headlines is that he was the only wizard around at the time that could actually do magic. he could only do what little he did because of his bloodline. (half demon) The original tales all show him as a remnant of an older age: senile and unreliable. Low marks across the board except in a completely magic-deprived environment. Trapped in the end by an unremarkable elf maiden (Nimh/Nimue) while pursuing her with lust on his mind. Gandalf: Personally sent by a major power as a member of a team of 5 whose mission was to thwart the largest evil power remaining in the universe. His council was considered worthwhile by Galadriel, the oldest being on the shores of Middle Earth save possibly Bombadil. At the height of his power, summoned and dismissed the his defrocked superior by sheer force of will, even though his opponent was still technically on his home turf. Personally stood in for the gates of Gondor against the entrance of the Witch King when the gates had been thrown down. A pyrric victory against a balrog is still a *victory* against a *balrog*. Gargamel: Never heard of him. Ipso facto: not a biggie. [Looked him up: Some Smurf-related villain. Points for me for never having heard of him. Clearly not a real contender, even against Rincewind] Elminster: OK, big and bad, but come on... one of many many powerful wizards in the world of Greyhawk. Not even clearly the most powerful ever in that world. Consider briefly an Elminster v Gandalf steel-cage deathmatch: Elminster casts, Gandalf saves. Elminster casts, Gandalf saves. Elminster casts, Gandalf saves. Repeat until all of Elminster's memorized spells are cast and his staff of the Archmage is out of charges. Gandalf breaks out Glamdring and cleaves Elminster in two while Elminster is still complaining that magic users can only use daggers. Potter: Not bad. Clearly a standout on the planet: he can resist (even with help) the uncounterable death spell and summon a protective spirit essentially untrained. A human mage whose long term potential we do not really know yet. I kinda doubt we'll get something like I-died-and-was-personally-sent-back-by-God-to-fini sh-my-work though. Rincewind: Full marks for having luck. Luck trumps a lot. Forty two ranks in Mastery of Cowardice. Fleeing a lot doesn't hurt in avoiding checks in the "L" column. Doesn't actually end up with any in the "W" column, either. Rincewind's score vs all other wizards: 0 wins, 0 losses, 6 byes. Ged: Well dang. IMO an actual contender for Gandalf. Done the personal-purification-by-fire thing too. Conversation considered worthwhile by Orm Embar, the rough equivalent of Ancalagon the Black, possibly even Illuvatar. Has Gandalf talked to Illuvatar or Ancalagon? I don't *think* so. One wouldn't give him the time of day, the other would consider him a light snack. On the other hand, Ged at his zenith was still beat down by a bunch of invisible evil spirits, albeit in their own temple. So he fails the Gandalf-summons-Saruman comparison. Excel: Well, for sheer diabloic evil, Microsoft gets their toe in the door, and for being the greater evil force, trumps both Merlin (who was only half-demon) and Gargamel (who is evil by virtue of contact by smurfs). You can't run or hide from Microsoft either, so put a 'W' in the column 'v Rincewind'. But as Ged said: It is light that repels the dark! Light! Heavy, convincing losses against Gandalf, Elminster and Ged. Eventually driven Sauron-style out of Redmond by the Open Council, and relegated to History Channel documentaries. ---- I think the Ged v Gandalf fight would be the best match: I imagine it taking out one heck of a lot of real estate before it was done. Nothing short of a Covenant-style ritual of desecration is going to completely overthrow either one. Definitely worth $50 for the Pay-Per-View of that fight, particularly if they could get Madden and Miller to co-commentate: Madden: Whoa! That had to hurt! Slobberknocker magic doesn't get any better than this! Miller: Yeah the dwomercraft is really at a high pitch down there. As the sumerian god Enki once said to his consort Innana, just before he released the curse of Babel...

Slashdot Top Deals

A rolling disk gathers no MOS.