Re:Internet petitions... (Score 1)

If my grandmother rolls her eyes at the idea of internet petitions, what reason is there to think that Uwe would stop making movies from one? Just because someone name Soukin McCocksoff said he's a bad man and should go away on the internet means he'll do it.

1) He is NOT the worst movie producer ever. Obviously you have never heard of The Asylum (ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Asylum) 2) If they're THAT horrible, simply don't watch them. Quite frankly, I can see people complaining about The Asylum, as they rob titles as other movies come out, but this guy doesn't lie to you, he just puts out his movies. 3) Again, have the sense to avoid what you don't like and let others judge if they do. If you want to complain, cool. Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but is there really a reason to go out of the way to do it? Quite frankly it's a waste of everyone's time involved, both the readers and the complainers. 4) Signing a petition only empowers him into knowing how many people watch his movies. If you signed his petition, you're a fool and followed blindly along like the rest of the sheep. To be able to actually stop him....DON'T FUND HIM. If his movies don't sell, he can't put out more. As for the loophole, yes that's wrong, but how many of us exploit loopholes? We drive 10 miles above the speed limit to get to work every day because the police won't ticket us unless we're going 11...etc. 5) Some people actually like his movies. I, personally, own Blood Rayne and I enjoy watching it on occasion. It's a B movie and there's a certain novelty to it. That, and quite frankly if you don't her rack, you're probably queer (she has a topless scene). So, for the same reason Under Siege with Steven Segal got popular, so did Blood Rayne. Boobs.