"Superfood" has got to be one of the stupidest words in existence. If I had to pick one plant to live the rest of my life on, potato would be high on the list. So-called superfoods like blueberry or kale wouldn't even make the running. What's better than any superfood? Having a large variety of not superfoods.

Well, yes, we certainly can make potatoes a lot less healthy by shoving them in a vat of vegetable oil and cooking it at high heat for a lovely combo of unhealthy fats, as well as boiling out as much vitamin C as possible. It would be a logistical nightmare to bring enough oil to Mars or the Moon though.

Probably misremembering the original copyright statute: Statute of Anne

It was 14 years, extendable to 28 if the author was still alive at the end of the first 14 years.

The same way I wrote university essays. I write from my understanding and memory of what happened and how things worked. I then identified presumptions in the writing. I then searched for references that backed them up. Sometimes that would prove my understanding wrong and I'd have to rewrite bits.

I run Android on my Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and RTX 5090 you insensitive clod!

Sorry, but, the US has spent much more on aggressive actions than any sort of defense since WWII. DoW is more accurate, though I wish they would behave more like a defense force.

Denying reality and thinking it really is about defense is more in line with being a fascist collaboration in my opinion.

Department of War is more accurate though. The US military spends much more time in foreign wars than doing any sort of defense.

So.... like humans then.

I'm certain the bubble will pop at some point - could be 6 months, or 5 years away though. AI will not meet its doom though - it will continue improving, even after the bubble has popped; just as the dotcom bubble bursting didn't doom the Internet.

They're crowing about 14 Angstroms. Divide by 10 for nanometers. That info is right there in THE FIRST LINE of the summary.

You missed the rest of my sentence where I said ChatGPT was used as a tool. I'll admit that AI could be a catalyst in speeding up suicide - to the point where if it hadn't been there the persons mind MIGHT have changed before they figured out how to suicide - but it's pretty retarded to think it's a cause of suicide.

Your crime against semantics has been noted. OP didn't nitpick vocabulary at all. I think the real harm is that we've been taught that it's OK to be offended by words. Also, no one is committing suicide because of ChatGPT - he used that as a tool. If it wasn't there he would have found a way regardless.

Whether or not something is bad for the environment has nothing to do with whether or not it is science. Also, the environment/climate will do just fine with heaps of CO2 and rising sea levels. Whether particular species (such has humans) do okay, is a different story. CO2 does not cause climate 'breakdown', it encourages climate change. I'm not sure what it would mean for the climate to 'break down'.

The question that matters here is what is worse for the environment (in terms of human-preferred environment) between the polystyrene and the (likely tiny amounts) of CO2? Turning something bad into something less bad is still a win.

I mostly agree with what you said, but

Little nitpick - houses are held together with nails because they are good enough and are cheaper than screws (slightly in manufacturing costs, and hugely in time spent during construction). Screws would be a lot better, and also make dismantling sections a bit easier.

It's such bullshit. Europe and Japan are also tiny (both IRL and on a map) and nobody underestimates their potential. Any underestimation about Africa's potential is nothing to do with its size on a map.

It clearly isn't. Way too many spelling mistakes and grammar irregularities to be AI generated.