Comment Re:Wow, thank you Slashdot! (Score 0) 147
"Developers".
"We also need funding."
Running out of Claude tokens too often?
"Developers".
"We also need funding."
Running out of Claude tokens too often?
Everything starts small. You're probably comparing to 30 year old browsers (with a million open bugs in their bugtracker). If this is written from scratch without using code from other browsers, it is damn impressive what already works.
"Claude, write me a web browser. Start with the core components required for a minimal viable product."
https://github.com/nordstjerne...
From scratch, in a sense. Scratching deez nuts.
The entire thing has the funk of bullshot. Yay.
> all online "ai" operates under strict "neutrality" rules
No, they do not. The rest of your message is closer to reasonable, but this is an absolutely absurd statement to make in any situation.
"Are AI Chatbots Spreading Misinformation?" - Yes.
It's fine that they're testing shit. That's fine.
But why is it not a complete dark site, with no connectivity whatsoever? Why isn't the traffic at the very least forced through a proxy and reviewed?
Sure fine they're exploiting stuff like artifactory to gain Internet access, but why was there any connectivity at all during the testing?
Weird how a service continues to provide that service, even if some other largely unrelated service does other things. Shocking.
...Gets more downloads than the thing(s) people already had downloaded. I wonder why that would be. How could a brand new app have more downloads in a short timeframe than an app that has been out for years?
The secrets of the universe are so confusing..,
I heard you like Copilot, so I put Copilot and Copilot in your Copilot, so you can slop while you slop.
The number of people questioning the relevance of Fark on Slashdot, as if Slashdot has been relevant in the last decade.
Slashdot USED to do SOME original journalism, long long ago. Now, it's nothing more than a very low-volume link aggregator itself, with occasional effort put into some posts here and there.
So he waited until he could delegate the task to an LLM, instead of doing ANY work on his own from the look of things.
That's an amazing degree of laziness.
Boo hoo hoo.
That's what they're supposed to be doing. The people running them may not know that, but... This is what they signed up for.
Duplicate question, answered in this post that's written in PHP5 and had an SQL injection vulnerability.
Yep, that's definitely why it's the #2 app (now #1 in the US actually) for the iPhone, for use with XCode.
100%.
Someday somebody has got to decide whether the typewriter is the machine, or the person who operates it.