Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Over-exaggeration of the month. (Score 1) 379

Without open source, Apple will find itself in the same position as today's Microsoft in seven years.

Doubt it. No-one (non-technical) cares at all about whether a product is open-source; they care about having something that works. And the iPhone works very well. Microsoft seems to be doing quite well anyway, despite open-source.

OpeniBoot project is just a breath away from getting Android onto the iPhone [...]

Doesn't look like it to me from that video.

Comment Re:I'm a UK science teacher with a chem degree (Score 1) 408

*agrees*

The seperate science modules (BCP 7) are a bit better, but not by far. OCR C21 is just far too full of whishy-washy content (ALARA Principle, Ethics and all sorts on top).

Out of interest, have you ever taught at A-level? I'd be interested to hear if there's any 'touchy feely' stuff there.

Comment Re:Well, from what I know... (Score 1) 408

Your suspicions are correct! Doing AS just this year (Maths, Further Maths, Physics and Geography). I agree with the huge gap thing: everyone has mentioned it at some point. For me personally, I haven't felt awash in a sea of 'Oh noes, this is hard' too much (not trying to be arrogant here); perhaps I'm naive. The only exception is Further Maths: it is quite deep (but interesting!). Nevertheless, I get through.

With regard to the pressing of 'Exam technique', 'A little better' is unfair: on the whole, the teaching is a lot better: more subject-based rather than exam-based, but there are still mentions here and there. Geography makes a fuss about it (I don't write consisely enough, apparently). Maths recommends looking at past papers a lot (but then again, it is good practice).

Anyone can get through a GCSE. You need to be able to comprehend and generate bullshit. A-levels need actual work and understanding. I think the difference in candidate's attitudes (i.e. they actually give a shit about the subject) makes a huge difference too. Don't worry too much.

Comment Well, from what I know... (Score 2, Interesting) 408

GCSE is certainly of low standards. It's not just chemistry, either: the new science scheme is shit all across the board. An example: in a physics exam, instead of 'Calculate the speed of this', you get three multiple choices, one of which must be ringed (one will be D/T, another T/D, and the other DT). From TFA:

"[...] teachers are being compelled to 'teach to the test' [...which] draws mainly on the recalling of facts, with no reference to logic or mathematics."

It's referred to as 'Exam Technique' and is total bullshit. But hey, I did it, and got 11A*s, so who am I to complain? Anyway, things seem a little better at A- (AS-) Level, from what I've seen so far.

Security

British MoD Stunned By Massive Data Loss 166

Master of Transhuman writes "Seems like nobody can keep their data under wraps these days. On the heels of the World Bank piece about massive penetrations of their servers, the British Ministry of Defense has lost a hard drive with the personal details of 100,000 serving personnel in the British armed forces, and perhaps another 600,000 applicants. This comes on the heels of the MoD losing 658 of its laptops over the past four years and 26 flash drives holding confidential information. Apparently the MoD outsources this stuff to EDS, which is under fire for not being able to confirm that the data was or was not encrypted."
Privacy

UK Government Says More Spying Needed 297

An anonymous reader writes "Our wonderful government here in the UK has decided we're not being surveilled enough, and agreed to spend £12 billion on a programme to monitor every Briton's phone calls, e-mails, and internet usage. According to various sources, upwards of £1 billion has already been spent on the uber-database. Rationale? Terrorism, of course (no prizes for guessing). Needless to say, not everyone is as happy as Larry over this: Michael Parker pointed out how us Brits are being 'stalked.' I'm just looking forward to when the data gets lost."
Communications

Submission + - UK government: more spying needed (wikinews.org)

An anonymous reader writes: Our wonderful government here in the UK has decided we're not being surveilled enough, and agreed to spend £12 billion on a programme to monitor every Briton's phone calls, e-mails, and internet usage. According to various sources, upwards of £1 billion has already been spent on the uber-database. Rationale? Terrorism, of course (no prizes for guessing). Needless to say, not everyone is as happy as Larry over this: Michael Parker pointed out how us Brits are being 'stalked'. I'm just looking forward to when the data gets lost.

Slashdot Top Deals

Staff meeting in the conference room in %d minutes.

Working...