Comment Re:I hate to defend Monsanto somewhat, but (Score 1) 617
You posted this same thing farther up the discussion too, but as I replied there:
You are correct. Actually they patent it. And judges have already ruled that even if your crop is contaminated with Monsanto's strain through direct see drift even if its a fraction of your crop then you Monsanto own your crop. All of it. Google David VS Monsanto for details.
Actually it appears that decision was made by the Canadian supreme court, and that it was only the case because the farmer recognized the cross pollination of his crop but continued to use the seed anyway. Furthermore, at least according to wiki Monsanto wasn't awarded any damages in the case because the farmer didn't make any additional profit even knowingly using their seed. That being said the whole thing does still seem a bit ridiculous....