Instead of being insulting, perhaps address the question or at the very least explain what "civics lesson" I failed to learn.

It's better to have a smaller swing-state dictate the president of the entire country?

It's like 10,000 peers when all you need is a seed.

"Theft of secrets" seems correct to me, as once you divulge the information against their wishes it is no longer a secret. The information may still be there, but its secrecy is not.

Set phasers on pedantic.

The cost is passed on to us "actual American humans" in the form of higher taxes and premiums.

For high-level information security experience with the associated clearance it is not that competitive.

And yet Yahoo stock was unphased by this news. In fact, it is up today.

Where is the link to delete your /. account?

It was extremely clear to me, but English is my first language so that may be why.

Nope. Not even close.

Interesting that they are finally implementing artifacts after pulling them out shortly after release. Will be interested to see how they balance them.

Basically your entire argument is that if you aren't educated enough ("enough" being defined by you I guess) then you should be stripped of your right to vote. Are you fine with having people in Canada disenfranchised if they aren't following the news closely enough?

That is hilarious. And it's so bizarre I can't even take it seriously as a troll.

Going to have to disagree. Fingerprints (all biometrics) are identification, not authentication. Just like a SSN, if you cannot change it then it is not a secret.