New York and California do not get to dictate who is president of the entire country.
It's better to have a smaller swing-state dictate the president of the entire country?
Physical shit is cheaper anyway.
Nope. Not even close.
If you haven't lived there for five years, it is easy to make the case that you no longer have an understanding of local concerns that the local Member of Parliament is meant to represent.
Basically your entire argument is that if you aren't educated enough ("enough" being defined by you I guess) then you should be stripped of your right to vote. Are you fine with having people in Canada disenfranchised if they aren't following the news closely enough?
"If you can, help others. If you can't, at least don't hurt others." -- the Dalai Lama