I do not think the OP was disputing that. It seems like they were just warning other readers that the Meta servers have unreasonable or undesirable rules.

Code.org is just an industry advocacy group and lobbyist. Their actions demonstrate that their mission is to make money for tech companies, so they should have their nonprofit status revoked. They're basically just an industry marketing effort.

What you are suggesting is a law. The executive branch does not have that power.

It goes to show why you Trump idiots never see anything wrong with what he does. You do not understand basic civics.

Your post demonstrates that you understand what the author meant, but then you continue to criticize him for failing to be inefficiently and unnecessarily pedantic with his words.

Think about that.

There is no income limit for the parents who claim these but there are restrictions on what it can be withdrawn for. Those restrictionsâ"education, starting a business, etc.â"coupled with how this will be claimed, means that it will mostly be used by the wealthy.

This is literally welfare for rich people.

What about slashdot?

Maybe I should make a post complaining about the quality of a site completely unrelated to GitHub or anything else in the featured article. I could use the same tenuous relationship to the topic at hand that you did.

It sounds like, as with most AI schemes, this is just a scam. It follows the same pattern as other AI scams. Find an extremely difficult problem, claim you will fix it with AI, ask for money. It is the standard nonprofit scam with AI bolted on to it.

It shouldnâ(TM)t really be surprising that the compulsive liar was lying.

You say that like you know a damn thing about masculinity. There is nothing masculine about being an incel you little twit.

That's one narrative you can tell. Another would be that the Republican party really only thrives when their candidates are brazenly corrupt and immoral. There's a fundamental dishonesty to candidates like Goldwater, Ford, Bush Sr., Dole, McCain, and Romney, who feel duty-bound to pretend to be moral while pushing the same aristocratic bullshit as Nixon, Reagan, Bush Jr., and Trump. I would argue that the latter were much more successful because of their shamelessness.

Constantly morphing coalitions consisting of odd couples is just the two party system. The right-wing pairing of racists and religious extremists is a much better fit than Democrats trying to get union members and the trans community to see eye to eye. The Venn diagram of racists and religious extremists is practically a single circle. One could argue that it was the Civil Rights Act that really got them to lock step.

Identifying a singular genesis for our current problems that can be articulated in a couple sentences sounds nice, but we can always move that back to something else. For example, "This whole mess started after WWII ended and the Cold War began, because the military industrial complex has made us economically dependent on a system incentivized to embrace fascism." Or, "This whole mess started when the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans set the precedent for a two party system." One I like is, "This whole mess started when Truman's political cronies pushed him through as Vice President." How about, "This whole mess started when Joe Biden had the hubris to run for re-election and no one in his inner circle had the courage to vociferously insist he step down before the primary?"

History has no single narrative. It's complicated and messy. There are pivotal moments, but there isn't A pivotal moment.

When people describe DEI as hiring unqualified minorities what they mean is that people should be considered unqualified if they are a minority.

Brought to you by Facebook.

It could be interpreted as either biological, nurture driven, or both. The idiot parents who are reproducing en masse raise their kids to be idiots. The warning of Idiocracy is valid regardless of where one stands regarding the hereditary nature of intelligence/IQ.

But NextCloud and OpenCloud already do this while providing the software as FOSS. Set it up yourself and it is free. Want them to host it or support it? Pay.

Those seem like better, more mature solutions than this Open Desk thing.

What he is complaining about is that things like Flatpak make Linux applications work more like macOS. He is mad because many Linux distros are making things more Mac-like to make things easier for users like you. The OP actually wants the prospect of dependency hell because he would rather save a minor amount of disk space than have redundant libraries.