This post is embarrassing, you should leave.

Accusation.

Who doesn't like chicken?

I'd mod you up if I had points so take this reply instead.

Every time some technology innovation comes along and smashes a business model the incumbents cry and drag their feet every step of the way. Adapt or die.

No less than 3 points ranting about code of conduct. I guess no one can keep themselves out of the outrage wars these days.

It's weird how SJWs think anyone who disagrees with them is their personal hashtag boogieman. Why do SJWs find it objectionable to insisting that we shouldn't be making false accusations and generalizations against groups of people without evidence? I want fascists to leave.

Surprisingly both of these statements existed in the same paragraph.

So what part of this makes it okay to make false accusations and generalizations against groups of people without any evidence? Some people might call this... bigotry.

I'm insisting that SXSW, the people who received the "harassment" have said literally nothing about the origins or source of the harassment. It's clear you're a naive fool because you then believe a bunch of highly inflammatory SJWs throwing uncited accusations at people, and then you go and parrot them like an idiot. That's all there is to it.

Please cite anything you said, the articles don't give evidence or anything. Quoting spurious accusations from known shit-people like Randi Harper or Leigh Alexander does not count as evidence. It's pretty clear you're too naive to be discussing these things.

>I literally don't research anything and believe anything I read from highly suspect sources I see

Please cite anything you said

PTR, SPF, DKIM, a clean IP and a properly configured SMTP server will work just fine. You're doing something wrong. Slashdot please improve your quality.

Sort of, there were "Sales Associates" (entry level sales position, non-commision, red nametag) and "Product Experts" (promoted from Sales Associate, commission, beige nametag).