If the weather cannot be accurately predicted 100% of the time for three days in advance, why would anyone believe they can predict it based on some trending for the next 50 years? Or maybe this is perhaps generated by some political agenda to get a government grant..? Follow the money. This happens far more than people might suspect.

Next up from the university: predicting earthquakes and stock market indexes for the years 2041-2060!

Where does it say in the constitution that congress is responsible for being a consumer or even privacy watchdog? Isn't that the responsibility of the FTC Bereau of Consumer Protection, CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), the newly created Department of Consumer Protection or the CPSC (Consumer Protection Safety Commission)? See below for links.. these are separate organizations of government.

I think the congressional hearings are far, far too used. I watch as ignorant senators call up Goldman Sachs or Toyota and grill them on practices and safety. Meanwhile, they can't pass a budget for the bloated, ignorant government to run on. Senators act like royalty, yet they're the ones trading on insider information and often the ones who caused the problem with restrictive laws or regulations in the first place.

The gut instinct of all of us, when we see an article like this,l is to say, "My privacy is important!" and to be a little thankful for the government to be the oversight when we feel powerless, *yet* its the government who is tapping out phones, e-mails and electronic communication illegally. Am I the only one who recognizes how bad things have become??!

-- Ragetech

Links:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm - FTC
http://www.consumerfinance.gov/ - CFPB
http://www.ct.gov/DCP/site/default.asp - Department of Consumer Protection
http://www.cpsc.gov/ - CPSC

In dealing with a lot of these vendors for a very large company myself, I have to say this isn't a single-year change for them. A lot of these vendors probably have their hands deep in the pockets of some of these agencies, and will be reticent to change the model. They'll say they will work with them, however behind the scenes they'll just be strategizing on how to get the exact same cash flows from them.

At the same time, the government is operating from a position with no leverage. Engineering out some of these solutions may take many years and itself comes with a large expense, hence the "lock-in".

The *only* way the CIA will pay less is if they introduce a truly competitive threat. Although they may openly bid on solutions to get the best price, they only way they can actually do this is to start growing their own solutions using Open Source and hire good people. And I can tell you, at the government salary scales I've seen that's going to be a real challenge.

Good luck, "Gus"!

What ever happened to innovation, and sticking to a core business model? What is Microsoft thinking, they're not a hardware company. So there advanced technologies R&D lab thinks up something they can throw a patent application up for. They won't execute on it. They'll just litigate on it if someone does actually try to deliver something to the market.

Oh wait... I guess this is Microsoft's core business model, never mind my bad.